Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Event.path

> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 8:07 PM Chris Harrelson >> wrote: >> >>> LGTM1 >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:06 AM Xiaocheng Hu >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Here's an update as now t

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: CSS Anchor Positioning

Contact emailsikilpatr...@chromium.org, ko...@chromium.org, xiaoche...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/CSSAnchoredPositioning/explainer.md Specificationhttps://tabatkins.github.io/specs/css-anchor-position Summary Anchor positioning allows a po

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: 'blocking=rendering' attribute on scripts and style sheets

(Note: The feature no longer works on preloads, compared to the original I2P. See explainer for details.) Contact emailsxiaoche...@chromium.org Explainer https://gist.github.com/xiaochengh/9404abbecdc3b45c0e9f3d5e99fbc65d#file-proposal-v3-md Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/7474

[blink-dev] PSA: Event.path has been disabled in pre-Beta channels

Hi, As part of the deprecation process, we have disabled the non-standard API Event.path by default on Canary and Dev channels, as well as developer builds. It will remain enabled by default in Beta and Stable channels until the final removal (in M109 as currently planned). The change is made in

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: 'blocking=rendering' attribute on scripts and style sheets

1 >> >> /Daniel >> On 2022-05-25 11:03, Yoav Weiss wrote: >> >> Thanks for working on this!! :) >> >> On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 9:21 PM Xiaocheng Hu >> wrote: >> >>> (Note: The feature no longer works on preloads, compared t

Re: [blink-dev] Is "Keyboard-focusable scroll containers" still in development?

Hi Benjamin, Last time it was unshipped due to breaking Web UI. This is currently tracked by crbug.com/1040141 and owned by the DOM team. I'll update the chromestatus.com entry accordingly. On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:46 PM 'Benjamin Beaudry' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi a

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Scoped Custom Element Registry

Contact emailsxiaoche...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/Scoped-Custom-Element-Registries.md#overview Specification https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/Scoped-Custom-Element-Registries.md Summary This feature allows

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Scoped Custom Element Registry

Hi Lea, No TAG review has been requested yet. "Pending" is just the default value (which might also be confusing though...) On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 3:19 AM Lea Verou wrote: > Hi there, > I see it says "Pending" for the TAG review, but I cannot find any TAG > review request in > https://github.c

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Event.path

are not real usage (e.g., cloning every attribute of an Event object, hence triggering the use counter without actually using it) On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 4:25:57 PM UTC-8 Xiaocheng Hu wrote: > Contact emailsxiaoche...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > SpecificationNon

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS @counter-style descriptor 'speak-as'

(Though the I2P thread already has 3 LGTMs, there are some updates. Hence requesting another review) Contact emailsxiaoche...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-counter-styles/#example-cce4b0db Spe

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS @counter-style descriptor 'speak-as'

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 2:31 PM Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:36 PM Mike Taylor > wrote: > > On Friday, September 17, 2021 at 4:16:26 PM UTC-4 Xiaocheng Hu wrote: > >> Update since I2P: The 'spell-out' value is not implemented because it

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS @counter-style descriptor 'speak-as'

ber 17, 2021 at 11:57:28 PM UTC+2 Xiaocheng Hu wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 2:31 PM Tab Atkins Jr. >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:36 PM Mike Taylor >>> wrote: >>> > On Friday, September 17, 2021 at 4:16:26 PM UTC-4 Xiaocheng Hu wrote:

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: 'blocking=rendering' attribute on scripts and link resources

Contact emails xiaoche...@chromium.org Explainer https://gist.github.com/xiaochengh/fae2b549b3d37454beeb9028a829f4bd#explainer Specification https://gist.github.com/xiaochengh/fae2b549b3d37454beeb9028a829f4bd Summary This feature allows putting 'blocking=render' as an attribute and value to a

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS cascade layers

Contact emailsxiaoche...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://gist.github.com/xiaochengh/58c793e3bf06a1bb0f7d472ebb170feb Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-5/#layering Design docs https://bit.ly/2SGjPlu Summary CSS cascade layers (@layer rule and layered @import syntax) provide a stru

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS cascade layers

Also some updates since the I2P: 1. The 'revert-layer' keyword is now supported 2. Regarding concerns of loading performance when importing external stylesheets into a layer, it's recommended to inline the @import rule in a

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS cascade layers

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 2:33 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 9:49:42 PM UTC+1 Xiaocheng Hu wrote: > >> Also some updates since the I2P: >> >> 1. The 'revert-layer' keyword is now supported >> >> 2. Regarding con

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS cascade layers

in Chrome Dev once > it's updated? > > Best regards, > Philip > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 11:53 PM Xiaocheng Hu > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 2:33 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, December 7, 20

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS cascade layers

Updates: - Ensured that preload scanner picks up layered @import rules in

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS cascade layers

/show_bug.cgi?id=233937, https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233944 and https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234158 On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:59 PM Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: > > > On 08/12/2021 18:48, Xiaocheng Hu wrote: > > They are failing on wpt.fyi because the feature is not ena

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS cascade layers

arrelson wrote: > > LGTM2 > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 10:47 PM Yoav Weiss > wrote: > >> *LGTM1* >> >> Thanks for fixing the related CSSPreloadScanner issues! :) >> >> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 5:58 AM Xiaocheng Hu >> wrote: >> >>

[blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Event.path

Contact emailsxiaoche...@chromium.org ExplainerNone SpecificationNone. Not a standard feature. Summary Event.path is a non-standard API that returns the event's path, which is an array of the objects on which listeners will be invoked. It is supported by Blink only, causing web compatibility is

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Event.path

> wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 10:50 AM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 2:49:55 AM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Xiaocheng, >>>> >>>> Thanks for working

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Event.path

each if needed - Starting from September 2022, or if the known breakage number drops below a threshold (mabye 0.05%?), disable it on all non-Stable channels (via finch) to further speed up decreasing the usage. On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 9:59 AM Xiaocheng Hu wrote: > I'm still working o

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Event.path

d. > > Best regards, > Philip > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:04 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> Thanks for the analysis! :) I think it may make sense to do a bit of a deeper >> dive >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JUeNc-ZxxWTn2tz9M_DJ4cV-M8lBdp40xlnfQ2-Mhgg/

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: CSS cascade layers

late-discovered and >>>>> render-blocking CSS @import or @layer statements. That's likely to cause >>>>> significant performance degradation. >>>>> This aligns with concerns >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromiu

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS @counter-style rules in shadow trees

e the right direction. > I think it makes sense to let the TAG review run its course, as well as > give positions from other vendors a bit more time. > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 2:32 AM Xiaocheng Hu > wrote: > >> Contact emailsxiaoche...@chromium.org >> >> Explain

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS @counter-style rules in shadow trees

30 PM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 2:14 PM Xiaocheng Hu >> wrote: >> >>> Here's an update that the TAG review has finished. >>> >>> Is there a chance that we can meet the feature freeze deadlin

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: ::scroll-marker and ::scroll-marker-group for Carousel, ::column pseudo element for Carousel and ::scroll-button() pseudo elements

(With my TAG hat on) Could the shipping of this feature be held until 3/18? We have discussed the Carousel-related features at the TAG F2F and have some concerns. We've invited

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS interactivity

(With my TAG hat on) Could the shipping of this feature be held until 3/18? We have discussed the Carousel-related features at the TAG F2F and have some concerns. We've invited