AM UTC-5 Mike Taylor wrote:
> Did you happen to test the sites w/ the feature on and off, per Yoav's
> suggestion?
> On 2/7/25 10:11 AM, Reema A wrote:
>
> Any more info I can provide?
>
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 11:42:20 AM UTC-5 Reema A wrote:
>
>> Sure,
Any more info I can provide?
On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 11:42:20 AM UTC-5 Reema A wrote:
> Sure, I enabled the flag in Chrome Beta and navigated around each of the
> examples. I didn't notice any issues. However, since as I mentioned I'm not
> sure how they'r
Thanks for the feedback. Wrote out some more details and answers to
questions that have been asked below:
*Problem:*
It is trivially easy to detect if a user is in incognito mode through the
Storage Manager’s estimate API because the amount of storage made available
in incognito mode is signifi
gt;>
>> One more question: what are the actual Quota limits for storage on mobile
>> (including low-end devices), and WebView? Are any of them lower than 10GiB?
>> On 12/12/24 1:41 PM, Reema A wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback. Wrote out some more details and
av Weiss wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:08 PM Reema A wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the delayed response!
>>
>> > One more question: what are the actual Quota limits for storage on
>> mobile (including low-end devices), and WebView? Are any of them lower than
>>
xt, etc.
I found 9 examples I looked at that were not obviously fingerprinting,
although I couldn’t always tell what they were using the API for. Of these,
I saw references to QuotaExceededErrors in 5 instances.
On Thursday, December 19, 2024 at 2:54:55 PM UTC-5 Reema A wrote:
> > I'd
cation that it has more). I don't have approval to share the disk size
> metrics for Clank and WebView, but it's high enough that we should re-think
> the approach, or try to run an experiment.
>
> Maybe we can meet to discuss next steps, and come up with a plan together?
>
&
Any updates on this?
On Monday, February 10, 2025 at 10:40:02 AM UTC-5 Reema A wrote:
> Yes, I tested with the feature on and didn't see any issues as mentioned.
> I also tested with the feature off and didn't see any differences in
> behavior. But again, as I said, I'
es not increase it?
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:16 PM 'Reema Al-Marzoog' via blink-dev <
> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Any concerns about the new proposal? If not, can I get LGTMs? Thank you!
>>
>> On Thursday, April 17, 2025 at 11:11:08 AM
