Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS env variable for OS-level font scale

2025-05-27 Thread David Grogan
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 7:07 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > > > On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 9:00 AM Chromestatus < > ad...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > >> Contact emails dgro...@chromium.org, p...@chromium.org >> >> Explainer https://davidsgrogan.github.io/env-explainer.html >> >> Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS env variable for OS-level font scale

2025-05-27 Thread David Grogan
Hi Peter, Yeah, we call out that WebView situation in the explainer: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/main/css-env-1/explainers/env-preferred-text-scale.md#note-android-webview We recommend WebView authors whose pages use env(preferred-text-scale) to call setTextZoom(100)

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS env variable for OS-level font scale

2025-05-27 Thread David Grogan
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 7:50 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > On 5/27/25 10:46 AM, Torne (Richard Coles) wrote: > > On Tue, 27 May 2025 at 05:48, Peter Birk Pakkenberg > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It is not entirely clear if this will also be enabled for WebView as part >> of the Android enablement. >> WebVie

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS env variable for OS-level font scale

2025-05-29 Thread David Grogan
, even for a *single* complex site. If we ever get to a future where sites are all using scale-ems and look good with various user font settings without using env(preferred-text-scale), that would be a big success. > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 8:47 AM David Grogan wrote: >

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

2024-09-23 Thread &#x27;David Grogan' via blink-dev
I intend to add support for flex-basis:stretch as part of this. On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 9:57 PM Daniel Holbert wrote: > I think this is a Chrome bug. `flex-basis` is specced as accepting > everything that `width` accepts (plus another keyword): > > Value: content | <'width'> > https://drafts.cs

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

2024-09-19 Thread &#x27;David Grogan' via blink-dev
Contact emailsdgro...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#sizing-values Summary A keyword for CSS sizing properties (e.g. 'width', 'height') that allows elements to grow to exactly fill their containing block's available space. It is similar to '100%',

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

2025-04-16 Thread &#x27;David Grogan' via blink-dev
loper interest. > > Best, > > Alex > > On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 5:45:04 AM UTC-7 obr...@igalia.com wrote: > >> I think it would be good to wait for the CSSWG to clarify things like >> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11784 before shipping. >> &g

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: CSS env variable for OS-level font scale

2025-02-28 Thread &#x27;David Grogan' via blink-dev
and then the browser-level on top? > > [image: Screenshot 2025-02-27 at 12.17.24.png] > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:15 PM 'David Grogan' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Contact emailsdgro...@chromium.org >> >> Explai

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

2025-03-07 Thread &#x27;David Grogan' via blink-dev
Contact emailsdgro...@chromium.org ExplainerBehaves as 100%, except it sizes the margin box regardless of the value of box-sizing.

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: CSS env variable for OS-level font scale

2025-02-26 Thread &#x27;David Grogan' via blink-dev
Contact emailsdgro...@chromium.org ExplainerNone yet. An example usage is Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10674 Summary Exposes a user's preferred font scale to CSS. Currently, it is not practical for a page to detect if the user has changed their preferred font size vi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS env variable for OS-level font scale

2025-06-17 Thread &#x27;David Grogan' via blink-dev
t;>> projects. >>>This is not the case: we will be able to tell such web developers "use >>>`rem`s/`em`s and ``, ignoring the `env()` stuff. >>> >>> >>> I especially appreciate that you took the time to respond to these >>> concerns