Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS text-wrap: pretty

2023-06-22 Thread Alan Stearns
As one of the spec authors, I support the intent to ship the text-wrap:pretty value. But I think we should be careful to avoid associating this value with *only* avoiding single-word last lines in a paragraph. Avoiding short last lines is *one* thing an engine can do with a more elaborate line-

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-05-13 Thread Alan Stearns
Mason, Chris, (speaking as the CSSWG co-chair) Please prioritize responding to each of these issues. Thanks, Alan On Sunday, May 12, 2024 at 7:47:08 PM UTC-7 fantasa...@inkedblade.net wrote: > On 4/15/24 01:55, fantasai wrote: > > Speaking for myself only (not as Apple/WebKit), as an individ

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: RFC 9225

2022-04-01 Thread Alan Stearns
Does this go far enough? What if, in addition to not having bugs we also required that the browser cannot be hacked? https://dawnproject.com/ On Friday, April 1, 2022 at 12:40:26 PM UTC-7 Jeremy Roman wrote: > *Contact emails* > blin...@chromium.org > > *Explainer* > https://www.rfc-editor.org/

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Idle Detection

2021-08-19 Thread Alan Stearns
I am a bit confused on this point. If the new explicit surface does not also disable the previous hack, I don’t see how adding the new surface (however it might theoretically be limited) is an improvement. On Thursday, August 19, 2021 at 11:58:13 AM UTC-7 sligh...@chromium.org wrote: For all of

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Idle Detection

2021-08-20 Thread Alan Stearns
Thanks Chris. I find that much more responsive and relevant to the objections I have seen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@ch

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Idle Detection

2021-08-20 Thread Alan Stearns
very quarter. > > Regards > > [1]: https://infrequently.org/2020/06/platform-adjacency-theory/ > [2]: https://infrequently.org/2021/07/the-core-web-loop/ > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 1:06 PM Alan Stearns wrote: > >> I am a bit confused on this point. If the new

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS if() function

2025-03-18 Thread Alan Stearns
Alex, I trimmed down the quote reply below to point out that Emilio is asking for more web developer feedback. That will take time to get as authors experiment with the prototype. On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:10 AM Alex Russell wrote: > Will second the thanks, Emilio, but will reiterate that Blin

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: CSS fit-width text

2025-04-24 Thread Alan Stearns
I’m excited to see this prototype, but please take a look at the accessibility concerns raised in the issue you link to. I’d like to see the explainer work through these concerns and propose ways to address them. On Thursday, April 24, 2025 at 1:32:01 AM UTC-7 tk...@chromium.org wrote: > Contac

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Custom Functions (@function)

2025-02-25 Thread Alan Stearns
This is a feature that is greatly desired by developers, and as such runs increased risk that whatever gets shipped first gets heavily used and then cannot be improved due to web compat. I think it’s premature to ship without signals from other engines and without a TAG review. We should have m

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS if() function

2025-02-25 Thread Alan Stearns
This is a feature that is greatly desired by developers, and as such runs increased risk that whatever gets shipped first gets heavily used and then cannot be improved due to web compat. I think it’s premature to ship without signals from other engines and without a TAG review. We should have m