[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

Contact emails se...@chromium.org, dylancut...@chromium.org, kaustub...@chromium.org Explainer Keying of "CHIPS" cookies should align with other state: Specification Add cross-site ancestor chain bit to spec: https://gith

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

PM Vladimir Levin wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 1:42 PM Aaron Selya wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> se...@chromium.org, dylancut...@chromium.org, kaustub...@chromium.org >> >> >> Explainer >> >> Keying of "CHIPS" cookie

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

tatus.com? > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:24 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < > yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 4:46 PM 'Aaron Selya' via blink-dev < >> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> The first mit

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

sting SAA from users > > Is the above correct? > > If so, 0.032% sounds like a lot. Would it be possible for y'all to same > pages that trigger that use counter and see how many of them break and what > does breakage look like? > > On Wed, Mar

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

Additionally, with the filtering out of the "receive-cookie-deprication" cookie from the metrics, the occurrences of an A1->B-A2 cookie which this change would impact drops from 0.032% of overall page loads to 0.0012% of overall page loads. On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:05 PM Aaron Selya

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

ay not be exhaustive, and breakage there feels riskier than in other > mentioned domains. > > Have you tried to reach out to Paypal folks and see what they say? > > On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 8:05 PM Aaron Selya wrote: > >> My apologies for the delay in following up on this. >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

d, May 22, 2024 at 10:21 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > Any news from Paypal? > > On Friday, May 3, 2024 at 7:15:58 PM UTC+2 Aaron Selya wrote: > >> Thank you for suggesting a deeper dive into this Yoav as I might not have >> discovered th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

s.com. > > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 7:50 AM 'Aaron Selya' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Had a good initial conversation with them on Monday letting them know >> about the issue. They're going to do some testing with the feature enabled

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

I haven't heard back from Paypal yet, I'm planning on following up with them today to see if they have any updates on their testing. Besides hearing back from them, is there any other information that's holding up LGTM? On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 1:53 PM Aaron Selya wrote: > @Ch

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

e you can give an update or summary of the web compatibility risk? > > /Daniel > > > On 2024-06-07 21:44, 'Aaron Selya' via blink-dev wrote: > > Devtools updates have landed (see attached screenshot) and are available > in Canary. > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 9:44