Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

2023-09-12 Thread 'Kyra Seevers' via blink-dev
Hi Muhammad, I have filed this bug for the issue: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1481485. We would appreciate it if you could describe your set-up with more detail in this bug. Have you registered for the deprecation trial described here?: https://developer.chrome.com/en/blo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 1

2023-09-14 Thread 'Kyra Seevers' via blink-dev
Thanks for the questions! > Does phase 1 have any web-exposed or user-visible changes? No. Phase 1 has no user-visible changes - only changes to the HistoryDatabase backend. > Not a blocker for the experiment, but might be worthwhile to file positions early. SGTM thank you. > How long are you pl

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

2023-09-20 Thread 'Kyra Seevers' via blink-dev
Hi Chinmay, Thanks for reaching out! Due to internal delays, we won't be rolling out to Stable 100% likely until the end of the week or the beginning of next week. I'll keep the thread updated with any further delays. Thanks, Kyra On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:50 PM Chinmay Manchanda wrote: > Hi K

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

2023-10-05 Thread 'Kyra Seevers' via blink-dev
Hi Illia, Thanks for reaching out - does this bug answer any of your questions?: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1481485&q=reporter%3Ame&can=1 If not, could you please file a bug describing your set-up here: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/entry, and add the labe

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Partitioning :visited links history

2023-06-28 Thread 'Kyra Seevers' via blink-dev
Hi Dave, Thanks for the question! This intent only covers the partitioning of the VisitedLink hashtable by a partition key, and does not include plans to limit what keys are stored by each renderer in its VisitedLinkReader instance. However, we are aware that this would be an area of future work t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

2023-07-24 Thread 'Kyra Seevers' via blink-dev
Hi there, Thank you for your email - as of today (Monday 7/24/23), the feature is not rolled-out to stable. However, I can confirm that the rollout schedule for this feature begins in M115 at Stable 1% (once M115 is served to 100% of users). M115 is currently served to 12.5% of users - you can tr

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

2023-07-24 Thread 'Kyra Seevers' via blink-dev
> Would this be the alternatives for the deprecation trial? Yes, the enterprise policy `DefaultThirdPartyStoragePartitioningSetting` is another method of achieving unpartitioned storage. It would require the standard enterprise management setup: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

2023-07-27 Thread 'Kyra Seevers' via blink-dev
Hi all, M115 is now being served at 100% on Desktop and Android. We will begin the rollout to Stable 1% shortly - the approximate rollout schedule is now as follows: Stable 1%: July 28th Stable 10%: Aug 11th Stable 50%: Aug 25th Stable 100%: Sept 8th On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:52 AM Mike Taylor

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Allow cookie domain attributes to be the empty string

2021-11-29 Thread 'Kyra Seevers' via blink-dev
Contact emailskyraseev...@chromium.org, miketa...@chromium.org, jadekess...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1332 https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1709 Specification https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis#section-5.4

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Allow cookie domain attributes to be the empty string

2022-01-21 Thread 'Kyra Seevers' via blink-dev
Contact emailskyraseev...@chromium.org, miketa...@chromium.org, jadekess...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1332 https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1709 Specification https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis#section-5.4

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 2

2024-10-15 Thread 'Kyra Seevers' via blink-dev
Hi all, FYI: we have had some delays in the experimental rollout and will be continuing with low-level (Stable 1% or lower) Finch experiments in M131 (and probably in M132 as well). Feel free to respond with any questions or concerns - thanks so much! @Yoav Weiss due to the extra development ti

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 2

2025-01-14 Thread 'Kyra Seevers' via blink-dev
Hi all - Happy New Year! As an FYI, due to some extra time spent in debugging and analysis, will be continuing with low-level (Stable 1% or lower) Finch experiments in M133. Luckily this is within 6 milestones of our original experiment request date (I will be sure to just go ahead and request 6 n