Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2023-01-06 Thread 'Dylan Cutler' via blink-dev
t;>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 5:37 PM Chris Harrelson >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 10:34 AM 'Johann Hofmann' via blink-dev < >>>> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Yoav

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2023-02-01 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
022 at 5:37 PM Chris Harrelson >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 10:34 AM 'Johann Hofmann' via blink-dev < >>>>> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >>>>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2023-02-09 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 5:37 PM Chris Harrelson >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 10:34 AM '

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2023-02-22 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:43 AM Johann Hofmann >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 5:37 PM Chris Harrelson >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2023-03-02 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
>>>>>> LGTM2 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:43 AM Johann Hofmann >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 5:3

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2023-03-09 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
gt;>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 5:24 AM Yoav Weiss >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> LGTM2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:43 AM Johann Hofmann >>>>>&g

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2023-03-21 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
022 at 10:55 AM Rick Byers wrote: > > LGTM3 > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 5:24 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > LGTM2 > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:43 AM Johann Hofmann > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 5:37 PM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2023-04-07 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
>> >>>>> Another quick update. Due to a partitioned cookies privacy bug >>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1405772> that >>>>> was discovered, we have to delay the launch of CHIPS to M110, which is the >>>&

[blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Relaunch: CHIPS on WebView

2024-05-29 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
Hello Blink API Owners, We’re seeking approval to unship and relaunch CHIPS (a.k.a. partitioned cookies) in Android WebView only. Rationale The WebViewClient supports a method, shouldInterceptRequest

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Relaunch: CHIPS on WebView

2024-06-05 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
m UMA to start to inform if we want to pursue the algorithm in (2). Thanks, Dylan On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 5:11 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 5:02 PM 'Dylan Cutler' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Hello Blink API Owners

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Relaunch: CHIPS on WebView

2024-06-28 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
; > The first item looks like a good starting point. We can discuss possible > solutions when we know how much usage there is. > > For visibility, can you please file a chromestatus entry for this intent? > > Thanks, > Vlad > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 10:36 AM 'Dyla

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Relaunch: CHIPS on WebView

2024-07-17 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
s entry? > [image: chipsna.png] > > Thanks, > Vlad > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 1:17 PM Torne (Richard Coles) > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 10:20, Vladimir Levin wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024, 16:28

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2022-05-25 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
Contact emails dylancut...@google.com, kaustub...@google.com Spec (Copied from I2E) https://github.com/WICG/CHIPS Summary (Copied from I2E) Given that Chrome plans on obsoleting unpartitioned third-party cookies, we want to give developers the ability to use cookies in cross-site contexts that

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2022-07-07 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
> LGTM to extend to M104 inclusive. > > (That brings out the trial to just 5 milestones in total, which is under > the 6 milestone limit before renewal requirements kick in: > https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#step-3-optional-origin-trial > ) > > On 5/2

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2022-07-14 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
, > > Dylan > > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:47 PM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> LGTM to extend to M104 inclusive. >> >> (That brings out the trial to just 5 milestones in total, which is under >> the 6 milestone limit before renewal requirements kick in: >> http

[blink-dev] CHIPS Intent to Extend Experiment

2022-08-08 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
Contact emails dylancut...@google.com, kaustub...@google.com Spec (Copied from prior I2EE) https://github.com/WICG/CHIPS Summary (Copied from prior I2EE) Given that Chrome plans on obsoleting unpartitioned third-party cookies, we want to give developers the ability to use cookies in cross-site

Re: [blink-dev] CHIPS Intent to Extend Experiment

2022-08-09 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
> you intend to extend the OT further. > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 4:42 PM 'Dylan Cutler' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> dylancut...@google.com, kaustub...@google.com >> >> Spec (Copied from prio

Re: [blink-dev] CHIPS Intent to Extend Experiment

2022-09-16 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
t;>> Hence it might be worthwhile to use that extra milestone to make progress >>> towards shipping artifacts: spec draft, TAG review, vendor signals, etc, if >>> you intend to extend the OT further. >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 4:42 PM 'Dylan Cutler' vi

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2022-10-20 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
Contact emails: dylancut...@google.com, kaustub...@google.com Proposal repository: https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wL2lCXpaVOi0cWOn_ehfLFIZQxT3t0SH-ANnZYPEB0I/edit?usp=sharing Specification: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cutler-http

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2022-10-20 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
*Estimated Milestone for Shipping:* 109 Apologies, I included the OT milestones instead... On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 4:57 PM Dylan Cutler wrote: > Contact emails: > > dylancut...@google.com, kaustub...@google.com > > Proposal repository: > > https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS > > Design doc: > >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2022-11-10 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
all, but I wasn't able to find minutes. Could you help me >> understand the rationale? >> >> 2. There are a few issues open against the spec that seem like they ought >> to be resolved before shipping. >> https://github.com/privacycg/CHIPS/issues/58, >&g

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2022-02-01 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
Contact emails dylancut...@google.com, kaustub...@google.com Spec https://github.com/WICG/CHIPS Summary Given that Chrome plans on obsoleting unpartitioned third-party cookies, we want to give developers the ability to use cookies in cross-site contexts that are partitioned by top-level site (

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2022-02-02 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
hat is right, should this prepare the syntax to allow for step 3, like > having "Partitioned=Absolutely" and "Partitioned=Nope" instead of just > partitioned? > > In step 4 I assume "Partitioned" becomes a no-op since that is the only > available sta

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2022-03-31 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
plicitly asks for their >>> cookies to stop tracking people. >>> >>> 3. (outside this experiment) Eventually the default might change to >>> "Partioned" and another flag will have to be used to keep tracking users >>> cross sites. >>> >>> 4

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

2022-04-27 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
t; it's absence being "false"). >>>> >>>> Do you have partners ready to start testing this? >>>>> >>>> Yes, there are a couple partners I know offhand who are interested in >>>> testing this. >>>> >>>&

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Related Website Partition (RWP) API

2025-04-04 Thread &#x27;Dylan Cutler&#x27; via blink-dev
Explainer https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/related-website-partition-api Specification None Summary The Related Website Partition (RWP) API is a novel mechanism for providing third-party embeds access to a partitioned, non-cookie storage handle which allows them to continue a single s