Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Session API: enterpictureinpicture action

Hi, Please update your chromestatus entry to trigger the other 5 review categories for this intent. I think it's probably the case that you ended up with the wrong feature category and need to update it, sorry for any confusion. @Jason Robbins also. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 3:35 PM 'Tommy Steimel'

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Streams API: ReadableStream async iteration

Hi, Please start the reviews for the 5 other areas shown below in your chromestatus entry (once you've done show they should turn blue, not gray): [image: Screenshot 2024-02-21 9.08.57 AM.png] On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 8:03 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > LGTM1 > > Th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAssembly JS String Builtins

On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 10:37 AM Adam Klein wrote: > Contact emailsecmzieg...@chromium.org, jkumme...@chromium.org, > ad...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-string-builtins/blob/main/proposals/js-string-builtins/Overview.md > > Specificationhttps://webassembly.github.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship : :has() pseudo class

Hi Byungwoo, I think it would be better to resolve the referenced issues at the CSSWG, including aspects Antti mentioned here, before shipping. On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 6:05 AM Byungwoo Lee wrote: > > On 5/18/22 17:33, Antti Koivisto wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 9:19:03 AM UTC+3 b

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Element.isVisible method

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 1:44 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > It looks like the TAG was prodded, since the "2022-06-13-week" > milestone was just added to > https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/734. > > However, I don't think it's reasonable for us to keep waiting for the > TAG until mid-

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Custom Highlight API

LGTM2 then. :( On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 8:58 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 11:54:30 PM UTC+2 Daniel Clark wrote: > >> *> What's the feature detection/activation story here? Can developers use >> the feature while it's partially supported? What would be the implic

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Android OSK resizes visual viewport by default + opt-out

(API owner hat off for this intent, I'm one of the people working on this feature change) On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 1:32 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > I think this plan makes sense, but the lack of a spec makes it unusual. > > Can you say more about how this will eventually be spec'd, and who is >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Extend Origin Trial: Conversion Measurement API (Attribution Reporting API)

Updated. On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 6:34 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > Thanks for the feedback report. It's great!! > > LGTM1 to extend the OT to M97 > > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2021, 00:37 John Delaney wrote: > >> > We're inclined to extend this OT, but wanted to quickly check in to see >> if y'all have any i

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CORS non-wildcard request-header

Would it be feasible to get a random list of 10-20 sites that hit the use counter and see if they are broken badly by this feature? On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 4:54 AM Yutaka Hirano wrote: > (friendly ping) > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 1:57 PM Yutaka Hirano wrote: > >> Thank you for the feedback. >> >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebAuthn minPinLength extension

Hi, could you ask for signals via http://bit.ly/blink-signals? Really sorry we sent this request so late. On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 10:37 PM Akshay Kumar wrote: > Microsoft supports adding this extension. > > Akshay Kumar > (Microsoft) > > On Saturday, November 6, 2021 at 3:06:42 AM UTC+5:30 John B

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: Allow infinity, -infinity and NaN in CSS calc()

(fyi this is a test of a new method of replying to intent threads, we're still debugging it) On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:10 AM slightlyoff via Chromestatus < admin+slightly...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > LGTM, however this should be sent to the TAG as an FYI. It's new design > language that

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Aligning Resource Timing's `nextHopProtocol` attribute with the specs

Hi Tom, Four questions: * Do Webkit and Gecko implement the same behavior already? * Will RUM providers need to be notified? * In what milestone will this be shipped? * I assume that the behavior you're implementing is already specified and tested in WPT? On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:10 AM Tom McKee

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 11:11 AM Noah Lemen wrote: > At Meta (formerly known as Facebook) we have a fair amount of dependencies > on domain lowering via document.domain. We've discussed this internally, > and feel that the most difficult aspect of this for us currently is > identifying where we d

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Secure context fix for dedicated workers

I think this is fine and makes sense to run as a PSA, thanks for sending it. My only ask is to reply again if any site compat bugs are encountered. On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 6:41 AM 'Titouan Rigoudy' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emailstito...@chromium.org > > Specificatio

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Remove: -internal-autofill-previewed and -internal-autofill-selected

+Dominic Battre for feedback. On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 5:23 AM PhistucK wrote: > Or publicly, since it is on StackOverflow anyway - > https://stackoverflow.com/a/41530164 > > How do you suggest websites that have a disabled login submit button to > re-enable it after autofill, though? > > ☆*Phis