Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

2024-03-12 Thread 'Aaron Selya' via blink-dev
> > The first mitigation listed here is to migrate existing > partitioned cookies to include the new bit, and the second mitigation is to > have a flag that can disable this feature. Would disabling the feature also > include migrating the existing cookies back to exclude the new bit? > Disabling

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

2024-03-13 Thread 'Aaron Selya' via blink-dev
tatus.com? > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:24 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < > yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 4:46 PM 'Aaron Selya' via blink-dev < >> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> The first mit

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

2024-03-19 Thread &#x27;Aaron Selya&#x27; via blink-dev
; wrote: >> >>> Also, can you flip on the relevant review gates in chromestatus.com? >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:24 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < >>> yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> O

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

2024-05-01 Thread &#x27;Aaron Selya&#x27; via blink-dev
the review gates on chromestatus.com >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:25 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < >>> yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Also, can you flip on the relevant review gates in chromestatus.com? >>>> >>>> On W

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

2024-05-03 Thread &#x27;Aaron Selya&#x27; via blink-dev
gt;>>> If so, 0.032% sounds like a lot. Would it be possible for y'all to same >>>> pages that trigger that use counter and see how many of them break and what >>>> does breakage look like? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 8:23 PM Aaron Selya wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

2024-05-22 Thread &#x27;Aaron Selya&#x27; via blink-dev
evelopers can get around this deprecation by changing their >>>>>>cookies to be "same-site: none" *and* requesting SAA from users >>>>>> >>>>>> Is the above correct? >>>>>> >>>>>> If so, 0.032% sound

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

2024-05-30 Thread &#x27;Aaron Selya&#x27; via blink-dev
s.com. > > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 7:50 AM 'Aaron Selya' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Had a good initial conversation with them on Monday letting them know >> about the issue. They're going to do some testing with the feature enabled

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

2024-06-06 Thread &#x27;Aaron Selya&#x27; via blink-dev
t; Please also fill out the Testing section on chromestatus.com. >> >> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 7:50 AM 'Aaron Selya' via blink-dev < >> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> Had a good initial conversation with them on Monday letting them know >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Adding Cross-site Ancestor Chain Bit to CHIPS Partition Key

2024-06-12 Thread &#x27;Aaron Selya&#x27; via blink-dev
e you can give an update or summary of the web compatibility risk? > > /Daniel > > > On 2024-06-07 21:44, 'Aaron Selya' via blink-dev wrote: > > Devtools updates have landed (see attached screenshot) and are available > in Canary. > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 9:44