Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Canvas Floating Point Color Types

2025-04-09 Thread ccameron chromium
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 5:57 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Have the spec changes for this landed, or are there open PRs? > All PRs have landed (and are now reflected online ). > > Best regards, > Philip > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 a

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Accept-Language Reduction (HTTP-only)

2025-04-09 Thread 'Shane Carr' via blink-dev
Hi, I'm here to note that the concerns from the i18n perspective, as listed on GitHub , have not yet been addressed. I look forward to productive dialogue. In the mean time, please do not ship this. On Wednesday, Apri

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Canvas Floating Point Color Types

2025-04-09 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:31 PM ccameron chromium wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 5:57 PM Philip Jägenstedt > wrote: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> Have the spec changes for this landed, or are there open PRs? >> > > All PRs have landed (and are now reflected online >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Accept-Language Reduction (HTTP-only)

2025-04-09 Thread 'Frank Yung-Fong Tang' via blink-dev
> Safari already reduced the Accept-Language to a single language in most cases. If my understanding of the English is correct: This mean, right now, in *some cases, * Safari does *NOT* reduced the Accept-Language to a single language, right? Please read https://github.com/explainers-by-google

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Accept-Language Reduction (HTTP-only)

2025-04-09 Thread Mike Taylor
On 4/9/25 3:51 PM, Frank Yung-Fong Tang wrote: > Safari already reduced the Accept-Language to a single language in most cases. If my understanding of the English is correct: This mean, right now, in *some cases, * Safari does *NOT* reduced the Accept-Language to a single language, right? P

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS if() function

2025-04-09 Thread Daniel Bratell
LGTM3 /Daniel On 2025-04-09 17:14, 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday, April 9, 2025 at 8:09:13 AM UTC-7 sligh...@chromium.org wrote: LGTM1 On Friday, April 4, 2025 at 4:15:14 AM UTC-7 moo...@google.com wrote: Does our implementation match these new ed

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: WebAuthn attestationFormats

2025-04-09 Thread Daniel Bratell
If I understand this correctly, the request is to extend to 137-138. Since the origin trial has already run so long, could you please supplement the information that long extensions require according to https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#origin-trials ? /Daniel On 2025-04-08

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Accept-Language Reduction (HTTP-only)

2025-04-09 Thread Mike Taylor
Also, thanks for the offer to help with the appcompat assessment - let's connect off-list to discuss that. On 4/9/25 7:25 AM, Victor Tan wrote: Hi Peter, I don't think we currently support the feature on WebView even if we turn on the finch flag. WebView might work a little differently, there

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Canvas Floating Point Color Types

2025-04-09 Thread Daniel Bratell
LGTM2 because I don't believe that there are no web developer signals. Surely there is demand for this? /Daniel On 2025-04-09 17:33, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 3:09 AM ccameron chromium wrote: Hello blink-dev! Floating-point support for 2D canvas and for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Canvas Floating Point Color Types

2025-04-09 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
Hi Chris, Have the spec changes for this landed, or are there open PRs? Best regards, Philip On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 5:54 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 because I don't believe that there are no web developer signals. > Surely there is demand for this? > > /Daniel > On 2025-04-09 17:33, Chris

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU: GPUTextureView for externalTexture binding

2025-04-09 Thread Daniel Bratell
// / Gecko: No signal (Mozilla members have requested during weekly standardization meetings that we postpone filing standard positions until we reach Candidate Recommendation (CR) status in Q4.) / // Doesn't this part creates a bit of a chicken-egg problem? Or am I misunderstanding the

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS if() function

2025-04-09 Thread 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev
LGTM2 On Wednesday, April 9, 2025 at 8:09:13 AM UTC-7 sligh...@chromium.org wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Friday, April 4, 2025 at 4:15:14 AM UTC-7 moo...@google.com wrote: > >> Does our implementation match these new edits? >> >> >> Generally yes, there are some thing that are not implemented yet, like

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: [WebRTC getStats] Align implementations on when RTP stats should be created

2025-04-09 Thread Alex Russell
Discussed at today's API OWNERs. LGTM1 on the condition that we make sure there's a flag for rollout so that this can be kill-switched if the compat issues turn out to be problematic for other sites. Best, Alex On Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 12:29:50 AM UTC-7 Henrik Boström wrote: > We can disc

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Ed25519 in Web Cryptography

2025-04-09 Thread Chris Harrelson
LGTM3 On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 1:51 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2025, 16:18 Daniel Bratell wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> >> /Daniel >> On 2025-03-31 11:42, Javier Fernandez wrote: >> >> Contact emails jfernan...@igalia.com >> >> Explainer >> https://github.com/WICG/webcrypto

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS if() function

2025-04-09 Thread Alex Russell
LGTM1 On Friday, April 4, 2025 at 4:15:14 AM UTC-7 moo...@google.com wrote: > Does our implementation match these new edits? > > > Generally yes, there are some thing that are not implemented yet, like > spread syntax (spec link > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#early-resolution), but th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: JavaScript Promise Integration

2025-04-09 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
LGTM1, very exciting to see this ship! There are some apparent failures in https://wpt.fyi/results/wasm/jsapi/jspi, but this seems to be because of https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt.fyi/issues/4216, not real failures. On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 6:32 PM Chromestatus wrote: > Contact emails f

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Accept-Language Reduction (HTTP-only)

2025-04-09 Thread Victor Tan
Hi Peter, I don't think we currently support the feature on WebView even if we turn on the finch flag. WebView might work a little differently, there is some work to support this feature on WebView. We can start the work in the near future. Victor On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 6:18 AM Peter Beverloo w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: JavaScript Promise Integration

2025-04-09 Thread Mike Taylor
LGTM3 On 4/9/25 8:35 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:26 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1, very exciting to see this ship! There are some apparent failures in https://wpt.fyi/results/wasm/jsapi/jspi, but this seems to be because of https://gith

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Canvas Floating Point Color Types

2025-04-09 Thread Chris Harrelson
LGTM1 On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 3:09 AM ccameron chromium wrote: > Hello blink-dev! > > Floating-point support for 2D canvas and for ImageData is now here 🎉. > This is the last API that needed support (after WebGPU and WebGL added it > in previous years). This will enable unified high bit depth (e.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: JavaScript Promise Integration

2025-04-09 Thread Chris Harrelson
LGTM2 On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 8:26 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > LGTM1, very exciting to see this ship! > > There are some apparent failures in > https://wpt.fyi/results/wasm/jsapi/jspi, but this seems to be because of > https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt.fyi/issues/4216, not real > failur

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to implement and ship: Support offset-path: shape()

2025-04-09 Thread Noam Rosenthal
(please disregard this correction, offset-path: path() is already supported). On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 1:38 PM Noam Rosenthal wrote: > I amended the title to include the path() function as well which is > missing from offset-path, as it's the same code change. > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 9:17 AM No

[blink-dev] Intent to implement and ship: Support offset-path: shape()

2025-04-09 Thread Noam Rosenthal
Contact emailsnrosent...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-2/#shape-function Summary The shape() function is already supported in clip-path, and allows responsive clipping. Enabling it also for offset-path will close a small gap where the same kind of s

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Accept-Language Reduction (HTTP-only)

2025-04-09 Thread 'Peter Beverloo' via blink-dev
Agreed, and thank you for iterating on this. If this is launching behind a Finch flag then we'd be happy to help with an initial assessment too :) Thanks, Peter On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 4:21 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > We do intend to follow suit there once we learn we can ship this and its > compat