Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Update of Canvas text rendering implementation

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 3:33 AM TAMURA, Kent wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:47 AM Vladimir Levin > wrote: > >> I'm curious why you decided to do an origin trial instead of a more >> typical finch roll out + monitoring metrics for performance regressions. >> Origin trial data would limit

[blink-dev] Intent to ship: Automatic beacon cross-origin data support (M135)

Contact emails lbr...@google.com, shivani...@chromium.org, jkar...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1386 Specification https://github.com/WICG/fenced-frame/pull/203 Summary This change allows descendant documents of fenced frames to set the root fenced frame’s

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS if() function

Will second the thanks, Emilio, but will reiterate that Blink's test here isn't WG consensus, but rather web developer feedback. If there's concern among developers that this proposal isn't on the right trajectory, would be good to hear that now. Best, Alex On Friday, February 28, 2025 at 1:1

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Update of Canvas text rendering implementation

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:47 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: > I'm curious why you decided to do an origin trial instead of a more > typical finch roll out + monitoring metrics for performance regressions. > Origin trial data would limit us to the feedback of registered partners, > which may not be a g

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Tabbed web apps

It still doesn't work in Chrome version 134.0.6998.117 (Official Build) even with flags. I've enabled flags: #enable-desktop-pwas-tab-strip #enable-desktop-pwas-tab-strip-settings #enable-desktop-pwas-tab-strip-customizations #temporary-unexpire-flags-m133 #temporary-unexpire-flags-m132 But it

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

You have 3 LGTMs, so there is no need to delay shipping. Please proceed. thanks, Mike On 3/19/25 4:11 PM, Jun Kokatsu wrote: Hi All, I've file a TAG review more than a month ago, but I'm yet to get a response. Should I wait until the TAG

Re: [blink-dev] Intent To Prototype: Delegation-oriented FedCM

Just a small update here as we took a couple of steps further in the prototype and learned that this proposal has a tighter connection to two features that weren't covered in the initial I2P: - Augmenting autofill with a conditional get to provide verified identity attributes: https://github.co

Re: [blink-dev] New at BlinkOn 20: Unconference Track

*(resending to the right alias and fixed links)* Hi everyone, BlinkOn 20 is fast approaching on April 7-8, 2025 PDT, and we’re gratified to see a great set of content coming together across breakout sessions (sign up

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Call stacks in crash reports from unresponsive web pages

Thank you all for the reviews! :) On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 7:32:56 PM UTC-7 vmp...@chromium.org wrote: > LGTM3 > > On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 at 8:47:30 AM UTC-4 Mike Taylor wrote: > >> LGTM2 - I see that Mozilla has proposed a positive position via comment. >> On 3/17/25 2:25 PM, 'Dan Clar

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Type-agnostic var() fallback

LGTM3 - thanks for filing the issues. On 3/19/25 8:59 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM2 /Daniel On 2025-03-19 10:03, Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 7:18 PM Alex Russell wrote: Hey Anders, I deeply appreciate the work you did to investigate the incompatibili

[blink-dev] New at BlinkOn 20: Unconference Track

Hi everyone, BlinkOn 20 is fast approaching on April 7-8, 2025 PDT, and we’re gratified to see a great set of content coming together across breakout sessions (sign up ) and lightning

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

Hi All, I've file a TAG review more than a month ago, but I'm yet to get a response. Should I wait until the TAG review is complete? Or is filing enough for shipping this feature? Thanks, Jun On Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 8:08:15 AM

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Type-agnostic var() fallback

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2025-03-19 10:03, Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 7:18 PM Alex Russell wrote: Hey Anders, I deeply appreciate the work you did to investigate the incompatibilities you found. 👍 Dan noted that we hadn't filed for signals with the othe

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Update of Canvas text rendering implementation

LGTM to experiment. One of the concerns is that 2 milestones may be too short of a duration for other partners to try this out. So my approval extends to the standard 6 milestones (136 to 131 inclusive) and I encourage you to use more than 2 of those to gather data. I also encourage you to roll