RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Interpolation progress functional notations: CSS *progress() functions

2025-03-10 Thread 'Daniel Clark' via blink-dev
Thanks for flagging that. I was surprised to see this since WebKit was listed in this Intent as having already shipped, but looking again at the WPTs it seems they have not yet shipped in Safari Stable, only in Experimental. https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-values/progress-computed.tentative.html

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Language Detector API

2025-03-10 Thread 'Nathan Memmott' via blink-dev
Contact emails dome...@chromium.org, fer...@chromium.org, kenjibah...@chromium.org, a...@chromium.org, memm...@chromium.org, christin...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/translation-api/blob/main/README.md Specification https://webmachinelearning.github.io/translation-api/#langua

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Enabling Web Applications to understand bimodal performance timings

2025-03-10 Thread 'Mike Jackson' via blink-dev
Done. Sorry I missed doing that before sending the I2E. On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 1:38:19 PM UTC-7 mike...@chromium.org wrote: > Could you please request the privacy, security & debuggability bits in > your chromestatus entry? > On 3/10/25 11:39 AM, 'Mike Jackson' via blink-dev wrote: > > *C

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

2025-03-10 Thread obr...@igalia.com
I think it would be good to wait for the CSSWG to clarify things like https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11784 before shipping. El dia dissabte, 8 de març del 2025 a les 2:59:22 UTC+1, David Grogan va escriure: > Contact emailsdgr...@chromium.org > > ExplainerBehaves as 100%, except it

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: SharedWorker script inherit controller for blob script URL

2025-03-10 Thread Chris Harrelson
Were you able to manually verify the SharedWorkerScriptUnderServiceWorkerControlIsBlob use counter hits with a test page? If so, I suppose it's possible no one is using this combination of features? Do you know of any site at all that does so? On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 5:32 PM 'Yoshisato Yanagisawa'

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS anchor positioning remembered scroll offset

2025-03-10 Thread 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev
Thanks! LGTM1. On Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 11:47:20 PM UTC-8 mste...@chromium.org wrote: > Daniel Clark writes: > > > Can you remind me what the current behavior is without the remembered > > scroll offset? I am wondering if there’s any scenario where changing > > this could break existing an

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Full frame rate render blocking attribute

2025-03-10 Thread 'Jiacheng Guo' via blink-dev
Sorry I may have some misunderstanding on the current implementation of render-blocking elements when it comes to scripts. I'll discuss further with the team and be back with the conclusion. On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:25 AM Jiacheng Guo wrote: > Yes, the design and the implementation allows the

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Full frame rate render blocking attribute

2025-03-10 Thread 'Jiacheng Guo' via blink-dev
Yes, the design and the implementation allows the critical content elements to be added via JS as well. I'll update the chromestatus and the explainer to include this use case as well. On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 6:06 PM Jake Archibald wrote: > On Wednesday, 5 March 2025 at 05:23:20 UTC Chromestatus

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Nested view transitions

2025-03-10 Thread Noam Rosenthal
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 8:50 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2. > > Maybe toss something like > assert_true(CSS.supports('selector(::view-transition)')) somewhere and call > it a day. > Re. the tests - it seems like a strange infra issue on the Firefox side, locally the tests fail as expected on fir

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS anchor positioning remembered scroll offset

2025-03-10 Thread Chris Harrelson
LGTM2 On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:29 AM 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Thanks! LGTM1. > > On Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 11:47:20 PM UTC-8 mste...@chromium.org > wrote: > >> Daniel Clark writes: >> >> > Can you remind me what the current behavior is without the remem

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Nested view transitions

2025-03-10 Thread Mike Taylor
LGTM2. Maybe toss something like assert_true(CSS.supports('selector(::view-transition)')) somewhere and call it a day. On 3/5/25 11:19 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 It'd be good to improve the tests. On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 12:47 AM Noam Rosenthal wrote: On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at

Re: [blink-dev] FYI: Frame rate throttling when no frames are produced

2025-03-10 Thread 'François Doray' via blink-dev
Hi, We will proceed with the Stable 1% experiment for this intervention. Rationale: - - The MotionMark regression is well understood. I discussed with +Camillo Bruni and we concluded that it isn't a blocker for measuring the impact of this intervention on Stable 1%. Howe

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Full frame rate render blocking attribute

2025-03-10 Thread Jake Archibald
On Wednesday, 5 March 2025 at 05:23:20 UTC Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails g...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/11070 Specification None Summary We propose to add a new render blocking token full-frame-rate to the blocking attributes. When the renderer is blo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Bounce Tracking Mitigations on HTTP Cache

2025-03-10 Thread Mike Taylor
On 3/3/25 10:32 AM, Andrew Liu wrote: Done, requested reviews. On Sunday, March 2, 2025 at 9:35:30 PM UTC-5 Domenic Denicola wrote: Can you request Privacy, WP Security, Enterprise, Debuggability, and Testing review gates in ChromeStatus? On Friday, February 28, 2025 at 7:45:44 AM