Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: SVG foreignObject does not taint the canvas for blob URLs

Hi Stephen,,any update on this intent? On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 12:10 PM Vladimir Levin wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 9:48 PM Stephen Chenney > wrote: > >> Reply to the spec concerns inline ... >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 12:15 AM Domenic Denicola >> wrote: >> >>> Seems like a good idea

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Device Posture API

💖 On Wednesday 9 October 2024 at 17:13:19 UTC+1 Alexis Menard wrote: > We did resolve this in the spec, my bad. As the FYI the W3C Device and > Sensors WG has decided to move this API to CR. > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 9:28 PM Domenic Denicola > wrote: > >> To be clear, I'm OK if the relevant s

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Device Posture API

Everyone, Thanks for the feedback. Let's take a step back here. The issue mentioned here is one that *i* opened asking whether we should expose this to iframes or not. I wanted to hear feedback from the community: we heard they want it exposed. There isn't an ongoing discussion. Now the question

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Device Posture API

We did resolve this in the spec, my bad. As the FYI the W3C Device and Sensors WG has decided to move this API to CR. On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 9:28 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > To be clear, I'm OK if the relevant standards body (i.e. the W3C Devices > and Sensors WG) has decided that this does not

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to ship: WebGPU: GPUCanvasContext getConfiguration()

LGTM3 On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 10:38 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:06 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < > yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> LGTM1 (from the right account) >> >> On Wednesday, October 2, 2024 at 6:51:28 AM UTC+2 François Beaufort wrote: >> >>> Contact em

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support external SVG resources for 'clip-path', 'fill', 'stroke' and 'marker-*' properties

LGTM2 On 10/9/24 8:52 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 On Monday, October 7, 2024 at 3:47:43 PM UTC+2 f...@opera.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 6:15 AM Domenic Denicola wrote: This looks like a great straightforward way of making the platform more consistent.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support external SVG resources for 'clip-path', 'fill', 'stroke' and 'marker-*' properties

LGTM1 On Monday, October 7, 2024 at 3:47:43 PM UTC+2 f...@opera.com wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 6:15 AM Domenic Denicola > wrote: > >> This looks like a great straightforward way of making the platform more >> consistent. Just a few minor questions for the intent before approving... >> >>

[blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Relax parser

Contact emailsjar...@chromium.org Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10557 Summary This change makes the HTML parser allow additional tags in besides , , and . This change is in support of the customizable feature but is being shipped first because it can be done separately and h

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API

LGTM1 On Monday, October 7, 2024 at 10:24:01 AM UTC-7 Chris Fredrickson wrote: > Yes, we ran an OT with 15+ registrants. The feedback we got was positive - > that this feature allowed for better UX via a context-specific FedCM > prompt, rather than the generic Storage Access API prompt. > > One

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support external SVG resources for 'clip-path', 'fill', 'stroke' and 'marker-*' properties

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2024-10-09 17:52, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 10/9/24 8:52 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 On Monday, October 7, 2024 at 3:47:43 PM UTC+2 f...@opera.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 6:15 AM Domenic Denicola wrote: This looks like a great straightf

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Exempt Speculation-Rules Header from CSP restrictions

LGTM3 On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 10:30 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Got it, thanks for confirming Domenic. > > LGTM2 > On 10/9/24 2:10 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > > LGTM1 > > I agree that this is a web-exposed bug fix, and that the likelihood of > negative impact here at this stage of the feature'

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API: increase contribution limit to 100 for Protected Audience callers

LGTM2 On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 7:47 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 8:48 PM Dan McArdle wrote: > >> No, the reporting endpoint can’t infer the number of null contributions. >> Critically, the browser pads the payload before encrypting it with the >> Aggregation

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API: increase contribution limit to 100 for Protected Audience callers

LGTM3 On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 8:36 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 7:47 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < > yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 8:48 PM Dan McArdle wrote: >> >>> No, the reporting endpoint can’t infer the number of null cont

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: WebGPU Subgroups experimentation

Contact emailsalanba...@google.com Explainerhttps://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/blob/main/proposals/subgroups.md SpecificationNone Summary Adds subgroup functionality to WebGPU. Subgroup operations perform SIMT operations to provide efficient communication and data sharing among groups of invocati

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Explicit Compile Hints with Magic Comments

Thanks for sending over the WICG proposal for this! I think there's now enough evidence of industry interest in this. That should enable y'all to move this to the WICG as a venue, which would resolve the IPR concerns. On Friday, October 4, 2024 at

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Device Posture API

+1 to either resolving this before shipping, or shipping a restricted version (not exposing this to cross-origin iframes at all, or adding a default `self` permission policy), which we'd be able to relax in the future if needed. As there seems to be active debate happening on the issue, maybe w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Exempt Speculation-Rules Header from CSP restrictions

LGTM1 I agree that this is a web-exposed bug fix, and that the likelihood of negative impact here at this stage of the feature's life is slim. On Wednesday, October 9, 2024 at 4:44:10 AM UTC+2 Domenic Denicola wrote: > (Note: feature owner hat on, API owner hat off.) > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Exempt Speculation-Rules Header from CSP restrictions

Got it, thanks for confirming Domenic. LGTM2 On 10/9/24 2:10 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 I agree that this is a web-exposed bug fix, and that the likelihood of negative impact here at this stage of the feature's life is slim. On Wednesday, October 9, 2024 at 4:44:10 AM UTC+2 Dome

Re: [blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Relax parser

Can you explain more why you think a web-facing change PSA, instead of an Intent to Ship, is appropriate for this feature? In particular, the lack of discussion of compat and interop risks is concerning. On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:10 AM Joey Arhar wrote: > Contact emailsjar...@chromium.org > > Sp

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Device Posture API

Thanks for resolving this! LGTM2. On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:43 AM Diego González wrote: > 💖 > > On Wednesday 9 October 2024 at 17:13:19 UTC+1 Alexis Menard wrote: > >> We did resolve this in the spec, my bad. As the FYI the W3C Device and >> Sensors WG has decided to move this API to CR. >> >> O

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Summarizer API

Contact emails dome...@chromium.org, fer...@chromium.org, kenjibah...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/writing-assistance-apis/blob/main/README.md Specification None yet, although we'll be writing one during the experimentation period. Summary A JavaScript API