Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: The Nested Declarations Rule

On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 11:06 AM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 1:54 AM Daniel Clark wrote: > >> The stated answer to “Will this feature be supported on all six Blink >> platforms” is “No”, but I’d expect this to be the same on all platforms – >> is that right? >> > > Yes, t

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Full and unprefixed box-decoration-break support

Contact emails msten...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-break-3/#break-decoration Summary Support box-decoration-break:clone both for inline fragmentation (line layout) and block fragmentation (pagination for printing, multicol). Traditionally in Blink,

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: migration to Wptrunner has started

Sounds like headless shell will be used for the majority of the tests, but that is not testing the full browser, but just a headless shell which goes through different code paths... I realise that previously it was probably run using content shell or something like that which is also not as represe

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAssembly JS String Builtins

LGTM3 On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 5:17 AM Domenic Denicola wrote: > LGTM2. > > Do we have a sense of WebKit's view of the proposal, e.g. through WebKit > participation in the Wasm CG? > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 11:56 AM 一丝 wrote: > >> Firefox has been implemented and is waiting to be shipped. >> htt

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Shared Storage: Allowing Cross-Origin Script in addModule & Aligning createWorklet

LGTM2 On Wednesday, September 4, 2024 at 5:07:54 AM UTC+2 Domenic Denicola wrote: > LGTM1. This seems like a good change for overall web consistency, and > compat risks seem well-managed. > > On Thursday, August 29, 2024 at 4:32:20 AM UTC+9 Cammie Smith Barnes wrote: > >> Intent to Ship: Shared

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Shared Storage: Allowing Cross-Origin Script in addModule & Aligning createWorklet

LGTM3 On 9/4/24 10:07 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday, September 4, 2024 at 5:07:54 AM UTC+2 Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM1. This seems like a good change for overall web consistency, and compat risks seem well-managed. On Thursday, August 29, 2024 at 4:32:20 

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Shared Storage: Allowing Cross-Origin Script in addModule & Aligning createWorklet

Sorry, LGTM3 conditioned upon Testing and Debuggability bits being requested in the chromestatus entry. On 9/4/24 10:21 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM3 On 9/4/24 10:07 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday, September 4, 2024 at 5:07:54 AM UTC+2 Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: allow more pseudo-elements and pseudo-classes after ::part()

On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:00 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > > On Thursday, August 29, 2024 at 12:48:36 AM UTC+9 David Baron wrote: > > Anticipated spec changes > > Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or > interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known g

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Real Time Monitoring API

LGTM1 On Thursday, August 29, 2024 at 4:13:36 PM UTC+2 Paul Jensen wrote: > Those open items are now addressed (by > https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1246 and > https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1253). > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 2:52 PM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I s

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Real Time Monitoring API

LGTM2 On 9/4/24 11:38 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 On Thursday, August 29, 2024 at 4:13:36 PM UTC+2 Paul Jensen wrote: Those open items are now addressed (by https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1246 and https://github

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Full and unprefixed box-decoration-break support

LGTM1 On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 2:42 AM Chromestatus wrote: > Contact emails msten...@chromium.org > > Explainer None > > Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-break-3/#break-decoration > > Summary > > Support box-decoration-break:clone both for inline fragmentation (line > layout) and block frag

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Full and unprefixed box-decoration-break support

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2024-09-04 17:53, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 2:42 AM Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails msten...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-break-3/#break-decoration

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Full and unprefixed box-decoration-break support

LGTM3 On Wednesday, September 4, 2024 at 5:56:10 PM UTC+2 Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2024-09-04 17:53, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 2:42 AM Chromestatus < > ad...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > >> Contact emails msten...@chromium.org >> >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: WebGPU: Dual source blending

Hey Corentin, Thanks for the thoughtful note on TAG engagement. The idea here isn't that the TAG will provide deep guidance about your design regarding GPU features -- y'all are the GPU experts! -- the general pattern here is the TAG helps to nudge groups to align with patterns it is seeing ac

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Real Time Monitoring API

LGTM3 On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 8:39 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 9/4/24 11:38 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Thursday, August 29, 2024 at 4:13:36 PM UTC+2 Paul Jensen wrote: > >> Those open items are now addressed (by >> https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1246 and >>

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: migration to Wptrunner has started

Right, performance is the major reason chrome new headless will not be used for the majority of WPTs. One mitigation plan is to run all WPTs on CI with chrome new headless, where it is less sensitive to the total test time. On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 4:47 AM PhistucK wrote: > Sounds like headless sh

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAssembly JS String Builtins

On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 8:17 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > LGTM2. > > Do we have a sense of WebKit's view of the proposal, e.g. through WebKit > participation in the Wasm CG? > WebKit reps at the CG haven't objected to phase advancements of the proposal, and thus are in line with the group's conse

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Remove expectedImprovement in DelegatedInkTrailPresenter

LGTM3 On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 2:37 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Monday, August 26, 2024 at 6:50:16 PM UTC+2 sahir@microsoft.com > wrote: > >> Done! Thank you. >> >> On Monday, August 26, 2024 at 9:41:45 AM UTC-7 mike...@chromium.org >> wrote: >> >>>

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Web Serial: connected attribute and RFCOMM connection events

LGTM2 On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 7:05 PM 'Jack Hsieh' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Sure, we just added an example > > of how this `SerialPort.connected` attribute can be used in the explainer >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Web Serial: connected attribute and RFCOMM connection events

LGTM3 On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 1:18 PM Vladimir Levin wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 7:05 PM 'Jack Hsieh' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Sure, we just added an example >> >> of ho

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Popover invoker and anchor positioning improvements

Contact emailsmas...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specification https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9144#issuecomment-2195095228 Summary This chromestatus represents the following related set of changes, which were resolved in https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9144#issuecomment-2195095228: 1. a

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: allow more pseudo-elements and pseudo-classes after ::part()

Thank you so much for those detailed writeups. LGTM1; it's clear this is future-extensible and you've carefully considered the tradeoffs. On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 11:30 PM David Baron wrote: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:00 PM Domenic Denicola > wrote: > >> >> On Thursday, August 29, 2024 at 12:48: