[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Language Detector API

Contact emailsdome...@chromium.org, fer...@chromium.org, kenjibah...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/translation-api/blob/main/README.md (This explainer bundles together the translator API and the language detector API, since they are very related. This Intent is only for the langua

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: meter element fallback styles

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:51 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > SpecificationNone >> > > My understanding is that appearance: none has a specification, probably > around https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#appearance-switching . Can you > ensure this field is filled out, and more importantly, that the >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support non-special scheme URLs

Hi, In our app we're using a custom protocol, and I'm trying to understand if this change would affect how we handle some URL schemes we use. In the interoperability section you mentioned that firefox already supports non-special scheme URLs, however when I test right now the result in firefox

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: scheduler.yield()

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 9:35 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > Very exciting to see this ready to ship after what sounds like a > successful experiment. A few small questions... > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 6:19 AM Scott Haseley > wrote: > >> Contact emailsshase...@chromium.org >> >> Explainer >> http

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement & Ship: Transferable RTCDataChannel to dedicated workers

LGTM3 On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 12:11 AM Domenic Denicola wrote: > LGTM2. > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 8:22 AM Thomas Guilbert > wrote: > >> Contact emailstguilb...@chromium.org >> >> ExplainerNone >> >> Specification >> https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-extensions/#rtcdatachannel-transferable >> > > Th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement & Ship: Transferable RTCDataChannel to dedicated workers

Thank you all! I will wait on the security review to finish, and will turn on the feature by default on M130. > Do you know if there's any effort to merge this monkey patch into the base specification? There was none that I knew of, so I opened an issue

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: scheduler.yield()

LGTM1! Please consider updating the explainer a bit to capture where things ended up, or at least adding a warning of some sort that it's a bit out of date. On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 12:33 AM Scott Haseley wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 9:35 PM Domenic Denicola > wrote: > >> Very exciting to s

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: meter element fallback styles

On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 6:07 PM Traian Captan wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:51 PM Domenic Denicola > wrote: > >> SpecificationNone >>> >> >> My understanding is that appearance: none has a specification, probably >> around https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#appearance-switching . Can you

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Extend Experiment: Captured Surface Control

Thanks for the clarification. Per the requirements for extending an origin trial , I see progress on: - Draft spec, maybe? Although there have been no updates for 2 months so I'm unsure if it incorporates the changes you're m