[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support non-special scheme URLs

Contact emails hay...@chromium.org Explainer http://bit.ly/url-non-special Specification https://url.spec.whatwg.org/ Summary Support non-special scheme URLs. Previously, Chromium's URL parser didn't handle non-special scheme URLs properly. It trea

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: The Nested Declarations Rule

On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 5:26 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > Can you flip the "testing" bit in the chromestatus entry? (and mark it > with "n/a" if that's the case) > I will, as soon as the tests actually exist. > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 4:31 PM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> LGTM3 >> >> On

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: RTCDataChannel.priority

Contact emailsorp...@google.com, boi...@google.com ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/webrtc-priority/#datachannel Summary Many applications have multiple media flows of the same data type and often some of the flows are more important than others. The priority setting can be used

[blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Remove CanvasRenderingContext2D method scrollPathIntoView

Contact emails schen...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/8216 Summary The scrollPathIntoView method on CanvasRenderingContext2D was implemented in Chrome behind a flag, but never shipped and never implemented by any other browsers in the nearl

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support non-special scheme URLs

LGTM1, very happy to see this make progress! It's unfortunate that rolling this out with Finch and enterprise policy does not look feasible, but very good that we still have a kill switch. Keep a close eye on incoming bugs will also be important. Good luck! :D On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 10:09 AM Hay

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support non-special scheme URLs

LGTM2 On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 9:47 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > LGTM1, very happy to see this make progress! > > It's unfortunate that rolling this out with Finch and enterprise policy > does not look feasible, but very good that we still have a kill switch. > Keep a close eye on incoming bugs w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support non-special scheme URLs

OOps, I take back my LGTM. Please fill out the cross-functional reviews: [image: image.png] On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 9:47 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 9:47 AM Philip Jägenstedt > wrote: > >> LGTM1, very happy to see this make progress! >> >> It's unfortunate that

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Real Time Monitoring API

We also extended our feature detection API to facilitate detecting this feature: Explainer: https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1238 Spec: https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/1245 On Wednesday, July 31, 2024 at 12:51:08 PM UTC-4 Paul Jensen wrote: > Contact emails > > pauljen...@chromium.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reduce Accept-Language

Hey Philip, Yes - we have discussed this a little bit, and are open to finalizing on that as a solution. But we'd like to gather some baseline metrics on the most minimal version first (which is the point of this experiment), and explore other solutions depending on compat impact (which we pla

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Real Time Monitoring API

Hi, I see that there are a couple of open items on the spec (mentioned here ), should we wait for those to resolve? On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 11:32 AM Paul Jensen wrote: > We also extended our feature detection API to facilitate

[blink-dev] Intent to Implement & Ship: Transferable RTCDataChannel to dedicated workers

Contact emailstguilb...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specification https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-extensions/#rtcdatachannel-transferable Summary The RTCDataChannel interface is part of the WebRTC standard, and represents a network channel which can be used for bidirectional peer-to-peer transfers

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support non-special scheme URLs

Done. I filled the cross-functional reviews (Privacy, Security, Enterprise, Debuggability (N/A), and Testing). Thanks! Note: The platform status has two "Prepare to ship" entries. Please ignore the second one. It seems I can't delete it. On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 1:51 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > O

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Remove CanvasRenderingContext2D method scrollPathIntoView

If this method was only ever enabled behind a flag, I don't think this removal requires any API owner approval. Happy removing! On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 10:30 PM Chromestatus < ad...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > Contact emails schen...@chromium.org > > Explainer None > > Specification https:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support non-special scheme URLs

Thanks for working on this!! On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 10:09 AM Hayato Ito wrote: > Contact emails > > hay...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > http://bit.ly/url-non-special > > Specification > > https://url.spec.whatwg.org/ > > Summary > > Support non-specia

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Summarizer API

Contact emailsdome...@chromium.org, fer...@chromium.org, kenjibah...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/writing-assistance-apis/blob/main/README.md SpecificationNone Summary A JavaScript API for producing summaries of input text, backed by an AI language model. Bl