Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove Web SQL

In case it's any helpful, I have written a migration guide on how to go from Web SQL to SQLite . It's admittedly only tested on toy data, so your actual mileage may vary, but at least the overall mechanics should be somewhat useful at l

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RegExp duplicate named capture groups

LGTM1 On 3/7/24 6:22 PM, Shu-yu Guo wrote: Contact emails pth...@chromium.org, s...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2721 Summary https://github.com/tc39/proposal-duplicate-named-capturing-groups

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Standard-compliant pseudo-element argument for getComputedStyle & KeyframeEffect

Contact emailsnrosent...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#dom-window-getcomputedstyle Summary The pseudo element argument in some APIs ( getComputedStyle(element, pseudo) and new KeyframeEffect(target, keyframes, {pseudoElement}) is currently parsed in a w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Extending Storage Access API (SAA) to non-cookie storage

I'm recused on this one, but even with the extension to 125, you're still not going beyond the default 6 milestones for an OT (the original request was for 120 to 124) - so the approval should be fairly trivial. On 3/6/24 11:31 AM, Ari Chivukula wrote: Contact emails aric...@chromium.org

[blink-dev] Ready for Developer Testing: document.caretPositionFromPoint API

Contact emails si...@microsoft.com, sa...@microsoft.com Explainer None Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/cssom-view-1/#dom-document-caretpositionfrompoint Summary This new API allows users to get current caret position from a given screen point. The API returns a CaretPosition object which r

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Standard-compliant pseudo-element argument for getComputedStyle & KeyframeEffect

Am I correct in understanding that Gecko already mostly matches the behavior in the spec? I see that Firefox also fails most of the WPTs at https://wpt.fyi/results/css/cssom/getComputedStyle-pseudo-with-argument.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned, but I guess that's because they have

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove Web SQL

Thank you Anton and Thomas for your responses. I really appreciate it. Anton, I did some experimentation with the WASM-based SQLite port today and I'm curious to understand more about the approach you mentioned. In particular: 1) Am I correct in understanding that there's a polyfil that allows

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove Web SQL

Does anyone know if the WebSQL db file itself will remain intact? I'm hoping yes, as that would preserve some manual options for recovery. Hans On Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 2:54:53 PM UTC-7 Anton Bershanskyi wrote: > Hi Hans, > > It's unfortunate that you find yourself in this situation. I'm