[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Syntax for registered Custom Properties

Contact emailsfuth...@chromium.org, andr...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specification https://drafts.css-houdini.org/css-properties-values-api-1/#syntax-strings Summary Supports using the syntax for custom properties registered with @property or registerProperty(). The syntax can be used to re

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS :dir() pseudo-class selector

LGTM1 Just for context, this was already approved 3 years ago: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/p0Wc66rbVOc/m/khHJ0dSsAwAJ But then we realized the spec text was not ready, there were some misunderstandings and things got blocked on that. Big thanks to push this to the f

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Relaxed CSS Nesting

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 8:46 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 3:14 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> >> Thanks for evaluating the compat risk for this. While non-zero, it seems >> manageable given Mozilla already shipping this, with Safari likely to >> follow, given the la

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Relaxed CSS Nesting

Thanks for clarifying and verifying! :) My LGTM still stands. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:48 AM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 8:46 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud > wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 3:14 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: >> >>> LGTM1 >>> >>> Thanks for evaluating the comp

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Syntax for registered Custom Properties

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:08 AM Rune Lillesveen wrote: > Contact emailsfuth...@chromium.org, andr...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specification > https://drafts.css-houdini.org/css-properties-values-api-1/#syntax-strings > > Summary > > Supports using the syntax for custom properties regis

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Relaxed CSS Nesting

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 1:29 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > Contact emails > > andr...@chromium.org > > Specification > > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-syntax/#consume-block-contents > > Summary > > Allows nested style rules > to begin w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Accordion pattern using name attribute on elements

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:04 PM David Baron wrote: > Contact emailsdba...@chromium.org > > Explainerhttps://open-ui.org/components/accordion.explainer > > Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9400 > > Summary > > This feature adds the ability to construct exclusive accordions using a

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:32:16 PM UTC+2 Alex Russell wrote: hrm, this is another instance of bikeshedding after shipping, and I'm not inclined to approve. Perhaps we can discuss at next week's API OWNERs meeting? We should definitely discuss this broader subject! Adding others

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Same-origin blanket enforcement in CSPEE

LGTM1 Usage seems low enough to make this safe still. On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 2:24:11 AM UTC+2 Jun Kokatsu wrote: > Contact emails > > jkoka...@google.com > > Explainer > > None > > Specification > > https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-cspee/pull/28/files > > Summary > > Removes a special

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Open popups as fullscreen windows

Personally, I'd love to see the Privacy and Security boxes in chromestatus turn to green before approving this, as this seems like a potentially risky feature. Bonus point for pointers to public notes from that review :) On Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 6:25:58 AM UTC+2 ajayra...@google.com wro

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:10:34 AM UTC+2 Traian Captan wrote: Contact emailstcap...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/IntersectionObserver/#dom- intersectionobserver-scrollmargin Summary Intersection Observer scrollMargin allows developers to observe tar

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

Am I right to assume that the API is still only being used by a relatively small number of partners to which y'all can communicate the new constraints? On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 11:08:43 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > Hey Alex, > > Apologies for the delay. It would probably be good to make a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Relaxed CSS Nesting

LGTM2 On 04/10/2023 11:49, Yoav Weiss wrote: Thanks for clarifying and verifying! :) My LGTM still stands. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:48 AM Anders Hartvoll Ruud mailto:andr...@chromium.org>> wrote: On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 8:46 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud mailto:andr...@chromium.org>> wro

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Feature detection for supported clipboard formats

Thanks for working on this! This seems like a welcome addition, and the example code of the current status quo is definitely something we need to solve! On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 6:50:40 PM UTC+2 snianu wrote: Thanks Chris for the clarification! Filed TAG review: https://github.com/w3

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Close requests for CloseWatcher, , and popover=""

On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:16:53 AM UTC-7 Domenic Denicola wrote: 2023年10月2日(月) 10:11 Alex Russell : On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 9:08:57 PM UTC-7 Domenic Denicola wrote: On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 5:01 AM Alex Russell wrote: The implicit behaviours based on construction order in th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

Hi all, I hope this message finds you in good health. I am reaching out to seek your expertise in helping me solve a problem. Our app incorporates an extension that aids users in accruing information from diverse sites, a feature that is instrumental in social network and business development,

[blink-dev] Unstanding StyleSheet

Hi Team, I am new to blink and I want to understand how and when css computation is done for every node and how to serialize that computed values. By computation I mean, after applying all possible rules apply to that node(own style, external style, insert rule, parent style, Pseudo element st

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Close requests for CloseWatcher, , and popover=""

2023年10月4日(水) 8:16 Alex Russell : > > > On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 10:16:53 AM UTC-7 Domenic Denicola wrote: > > > > 2023年10月2日(月) 10:11 Alex Russell : > > > > On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 9:08:57 PM UTC-7 Domenic Denicola wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 5:01 AM Alex Russell > wrote: > > T

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 9:47:02 AM UTC-7 Luke wrote: That makes perfect sense. For now I've removed the target milestones all together (they were rather arbitrary). But targeting 120 or 121 seems like a good idea. As for merging the spec change I think it should be ready to go assuming m

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audiences Negative Targeting

LGTM2 with the same conditions On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 11:00:07 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM1 % landing https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/796. Please > follow up with the WPTs as well. > On 9/27/23 11:56 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > Please fill out the other chromestatus revi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audiences Negative Targeting

LGTM3, same. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 8:50 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM2 with the same conditions > > On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 11:00:07 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > >> LGTM1 % landing https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/796. Please >> follow up with the WPTs as well. >> On 9/27/23 11:56 A

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefix -webkit-background-clip for "text" and make it an alias

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2023-10-02 23:16, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2, can you also please request reviews for the other categories in chromestatus (and file any relevant issues in the compat spec, if needed)? On 9/28/23 1:16 PM, Daniil Sakhapov wrote: Sure, I'm saying that old -webkit-background-cli

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Shared Storage API Enhancements

This looks good, but please file for all of the 5 other chips necessary for shipping a feature. On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:13 AM Cammie Smith Barnes wrote: > Contact emails > > cam...@chromium.org > > jkar...@chromium.org > > ale...@chromium.org > > yao...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > https://

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

> Have Firefox and Safari implemented the new syntax? No, I don't think they have started implementing anything yet. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 3:35 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:32:16 PM UTC+2 Alex Russell wrote: > > hrm, this is another instance of bikeshedding aft

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

Mike: thanks for the clarification, I've added a comment to the TAG review and kicked off those reviews in a new entry: https://chromestatus.com/feature/5148973702840320. I'll ping this thread when those reviews are complete. Yoav: yes, that's our understanding (although until enrollment is enforc

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Origin Trial: Cross App and Web Attribution Measurement M120-M123

Contact emails johni...@chromium.org, csharri...@chromium.org, lin...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/blob/main/app_to_web.md Specification https://wicg.github.io/attribution-reporting-api/#cross-app-and-web

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audiences Negative Targeting

Thank you all so much. I'll update this thread when https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/796 has landed. All the best, - Orr On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:51 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM3, same. > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 8:50 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> LGTM2 with the same conditions >> >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Open popups as fullscreen windows

Thank you Yoav, for your comments. We have requested Privacy and Security reviews in chromestatus. The Security/Privacy questionnaire is available at https://github.com/w3c/window-management/blob/main/security_and_privacy_fullscreen_popups.md. The Privacy and Security review for this feature wa

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

+1 on the API owners discussing this. I'd like to understand better how we wound up shipping :--foo and then having the CSSWG ask us to change it to :state(foo) instead, and what we could do in the future to avoid it happening again. It looks like the initial proposal was :state(foo); the CSSWG a

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

> I'd like to understand better how we wound up shipping :--foo and then having the CSSWG ask us to change it to :state(foo) instead, and what we could do in the future to avoid it happening again. I think if this was specced before shipping that would have been better and is a practice that I (an

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 1:08 PM Joey Arhar wrote: > > I'd like to understand better how we wound up shipping :--foo and then > having the CSSWG ask us to change it to :state(foo) instead, and what we > could do in the future to avoid it happening again. > > I think if this was specced before shipp

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

Hi Yoav, I don't know of Gecko's and WebKit's concrete implementation plans for Intersection Observer Scroll Margin. However, based on their responses on the github issue they were supportive. Regards, Traian On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 3:46 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Tuesday, September 26, 202

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

Apparently +Chris Wilson had part of this discussion with Alan Stearns in April at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8730#issuecomment-1524167658, and the suggestion was that if a CSS spec for a feature is "unstable" (meaning 'not at CR'?), then we should either post "we're about to send

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Session API: enterpictureinpicture action

Contact emails stei...@chromium.org, liber...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/w3c/mediasession/issues/294 Specification https://github.com/w3c/mediasession/pull/295 API spec Yes Summary Adds an 'enterpictureinpicture' action to the Media Session API. Websites can register an acti

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture

Hey, is there any official release date for the new PiP window without having to have the chrome flag enabled? Thanks! On Wednesday, June 14, 2023 at 12:47:58 PM UTC-3 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM3 > On 6/14/23 11:47 AM, slightlyoff via Chromestatus wrote: > > LGTM2 > > -- > You received this mess

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

Contact emails gerch...@microsoft.com, sahir.vell...@microsoft.com Explainer https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/PointerEventDeviceId/explainer.md Specification https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExpla

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS pages with Cache-control: no-store and Back/Forward Cache

At this morning's API Owners meeting, they asked me to add all review gate types to all of the "web developer facing code change" features that are currently under review, including this one. So, I have added Privacy, Security, Enterprise, Debuggability, and Testing gates to your feature entry

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CORS non-wildcard request-header

At this morning's API Owners meeting, they asked me to add all review gate types to all of the "web developer facing code change" features that are currently under review, including this one. So, I have added Privacy, Security, Enterprise, Debuggability, and Testing gates to your feature entry

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Shared Storage API Enhancements

At this morning's API Owners meeting, they asked me to add all review gate types to all of the "web developer facing code change" features that are currently under review, including this one. So, I have added Privacy, Security, Enterprise, Debuggability, and Testing gates to your feature entry

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

LGTM1 On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 7:17 PM Alex Turner wrote: > Mike: thanks for the clarification, I've added a comment to the TAG review > and kicked off those reviews in a new entry: > https://chromestatus.com/feature/5148973702840320. I'll ping this thread > when those reviews are complete. > > Yo

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:27 PM Traian Captan wrote: > Hi Yoav, > > I don't know of Gecko's and WebKit's concrete implementation plans for > Intersection Observer Scroll Margin. > However, based on their responses on the github issue they were supportive. > Just wanted to note that we typically

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Scroll To Text Fragment

Hi Adam, > Is it still not possible to disable this distraction yet? Chrome used to have an option to disable this feature, but the flag was removed. It is possible to remove highlights with extensions. I found "Disable Google Search Text Highlights"