Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation rules: target_hint field

2025-06-02 Thread Domenic Denicola
We don't have a timeline for removing that restriction. We believe it would be a multi-year engineering project, as it would involve changing the process model for how tabs work in Chromium, and don't have anyone staffed on it. (We filed this tracking bug

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation rules: target_hint field

2025-06-02 Thread 'Barry Pollard' via blink-dev
I've definitely heard back from several companies (large and small) of the need for this. Erik Witt's analysis may be the only public support we've got, but there are a number of non-public teams waiting for this too. On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 at 19:25, Alex Russell wrote: > Thanks for this. I'm a litt

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation rules: target_hint field

2025-06-02 Thread Alex Russell
Thanks for this. I'm a little concerned that this is a workaround for an implementation-based restriction in chromium, and that the goal is to remove that restriction through rearchitecture at some point in the near future. Do we have a timeline for that? It would also be helpful to understand

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation rules: target_hint field

2025-05-28 Thread Domenic Denicola
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:33 AM Alex Russell wrote: > The justification for this feature in the Explainer seems a bit thin. > What's the core problem that requires us to make developers repeat > themselves like this rather than, e.g., deriving the target information > from attributes on element

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation rules: target_hint field

2025-05-28 Thread Alex Russell
The justification for this feature in the Explainer seems a bit thin. What's the core problem that requires us to make developers repeat themselves like this rather than, e.g., deriving the target information from attributes on elements? On Wednesday, May 28, 2025 at 8:26:10 AM UTC-7 Chris Har

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation rules: target_hint field

2025-05-28 Thread Chris Harrelson
LGTM2 On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 7:52 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Thanks, LGTM1. > On 5/23/25 2:15 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 10:31:06 PM UTC+9 Mike Taylor wrote: > > On 5/20/25 6:06 AM, Chromestatus wrote: > > Contact emails robert...@chromium.org > > Explainer h

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation rules: target_hint field

2025-05-27 Thread Mike Taylor
Thanks, LGTM1. On 5/23/25 2:15 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 10:31:06 PM UTC+9 Mike Taylor wrote: On 5/20/25 6:06 AM, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails robert...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/triggers.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation rules: target_hint field

2025-05-22 Thread Domenic Denicola
On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 10:31:06 PM UTC+9 Mike Taylor wrote: On 5/20/25 6:06 AM, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails robert...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/ triggers.md#window-name-targeting-hints Specification https://wicg.github.io/nav-spec

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Speculation rules: target_hint field

2025-05-21 Thread Mike Taylor
On 5/20/25 6:06 AM, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails robert...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/triggers.md#window-name-targeting-hints Specification https://wicg.github.io/nav-speculation/speculation-rules.html