LGTM3
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 7:46 AM Mike Taylor wrote:
> LGTM2
> On 1/27/25 10:55 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
>
> LGTM1.
>
> I think it's a bit unclear whether or not this requires an Intent to Ship
> and API owner approval, but I'm supportive of the conservative path you've
> taken of sending
LGTM2
On 1/27/25 10:55 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
LGTM1.
I think it's a bit unclear whether or not this requires an Intent to
Ship and API owner approval, but I'm supportive of the conservative
path you've taken of sending one and requesting such approval.
The analysis about interop and co
LGTM1.
I think it's a bit unclear whether or not this requires an Intent to Ship
and API owner approval, but I'm supportive of the conservative path you've
taken of sending one and requesting such approval.
The analysis about interop and compat that you've provided shows that there
are indeed web
