Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

LGTM On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 11:33 AM Nan Lin wrote: > Contact emails > > lin...@chromium.org, jkar...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > > https://github.com/privacysandbox/tpcd-labeling/blob/main/cookie_deprecation_labeling_explainer.md > > https://developer.chrome.com/en/docs/privacy-sandbox/chro

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

Hi Patrick, thank you, we've received this feedback on SAH and are still looking into it. Please allow for a little more time on our side given the recent changes :) On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:28 PM Patrick McCann wrote: > > While Storage Access Headers >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

LGTM to extend from 136 to 138 inclusive. On 5/1/25 12:21 PM, 'Josh Karlin' via blink-dev wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jxck wrote: What is the motivation for 3rd Parties to experiment Privacy Sandbox, Storage Access API etc etc alternates 3rd Party Cookies from point of

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jxck wrote: > What is the motivation for 3rd Parties to experiment Privacy Sandbox, > Storage Access API etc etc alternates 3rd Party Cookies from point of view > of Chrome's vision change ? > We have received feedback that companies are still using the cookie de

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

> While Storage Access Headers was recently shipped, we would like to allow more time for the ecosystem to adopt this new API and provide feedback on whether SAH satisfies their use cases (see example discussion

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

What is the motivation for 3rd Parties to experiment Privacy Sandbox, Storage Access API etc etc alternates 3rd Party Cookies from point of view of Chrome's vision change ? On Tuesday, April 29, 2025 at 11:48:05 PM UTC+9 Nan Lin wrote: > Contact emails > > lin...@chromium.org, jkar...@chromium

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

I wanted to express my appreciation for maintaining the Cookie Deprecation Label into 2025. Speaking as an academic researcher (and only in that capacity), this is an invaluable input into our ongoing research investigating the impact of privacy sandbox on advertiser performance ( https://paper

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

Nan and I had an offline chat about burn-in risk. Given that, LGTM to extend from 133 to 135 inclusive. However, I still have some concerns about successfully turning this off and hope the team can present a timeline or approximate plan for expiring the experiment, as an artifact of "progress"

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

Hi Mike, On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 12:50 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > > On 1/31/25 4:39 PM, Nan Lin wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 4:35 PM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> >> On 1/31/25 3:03 PM, Nan Lin wrote: >> >> Hi Mike, >> >> Thanks for the response. >> >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:00 AM Mike Ta

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

On 1/31/25 4:39 PM, Nan Lin wrote: On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 4:35 PM Mike Taylor wrote: On 1/31/25 3:03 PM, Nan Lin wrote: Hi Mike, Thanks for the response. On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:00 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hey Nan, On 1/24/25 6:29 PM, Nan Lin wro

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 4:35 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > > On 1/31/25 3:03 PM, Nan Lin wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for the response. > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:00 AM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> Hey Nan, >> On 1/24/25 6:29 PM, Nan Lin wrote: >> >> Contact emails >> >> lin...@chromium.org, wander

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

On 1/31/25 3:03 PM, Nan Lin wrote: Hi Mike, Thanks for the response. On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:00 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Hey Nan, On 1/24/25 6:29 PM, Nan Lin wrote: Contact emails lin...@chromium.org , wanderv...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

Just as a side note for anyone who may find this thread looking for answers, navigator.cookieEnabled was changed to align with other browsers and will no longer reliably tell you whether third-party cookies are avai

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

Hi Mike, Thanks for the response. On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:00 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Hey Nan, > On 1/24/25 6:29 PM, Nan Lin wrote: > > Contact emails > > lin...@chromium.org, wanderv...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > > https://github.com/privacysandbox/tpcd-labeling/blob/main/cookie_deprecat

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

Hey Nan, On 1/24/25 6:29 PM, Nan Lin wrote: Contact emails lin...@chromium.org , wanderv...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/privacysandbox/tpcd-labeling/blob/main/cookie_deprecation_labeling_explainer.md

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

OK - thanks John. LGTM to extend until 132 inclusive. On 10/1/24 11:49 AM, John Delaney wrote: Hey Mike, We also plan to continue sending labels for the "label_only" groups as well, overall this <8.5% of browsers (these labels are also subject to a number of eligibility requirements). Curre

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

Hey Mike, We also plan to continue sending labels for the "label_only" groups as well, overall this <8.5% of browsers (these labels are also subject to a number of eligibility requirements). Currently we plan to continue extending this until the new approach is shipped, but we will provide any up

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

Hey John, Can you confirm these labels will only be sent to the 1% "Mode B" population, until the new user choice approach is shipped? Or is something else planned? thx, Mike On 9/30/24 10:12 AM, John Delaney wrote: Contact emails johni...@chromium.org , wan

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label Throughout 3PC Phaseout

We wanted to clarify that the above extension also includes sending the Cookie-Deprecation label headers during the trusted bidding and trusted scoring signals fetches for Protected Audience auctions ( https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/issues/946) as noted on the original I2E. On Monday, July 22

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label Throughout 3PC Phaseout

LGTM to extend from 127 to 129 inclusive. On 7/15/24 11:56 AM, John Delaney wrote: *Contact emails* johni...@chromium.org, wanderv...@chromium.org, lin...@chromium.org *Explainer* https://github.com/privacysandbox/tpcd-labeling/blob/main/cookie_deprecation_labeling_explainer.md https://develope

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

We would like to clarify that all labels will continue to be available in Chrome 126 after June 30th. We will provide further updates prior to Chrome 127 Stable release in July. On Thursday, June 6, 2024 at 3:34:28 AM UTC-4 Daniel Bratell wrote: > I agree. One lgtm is enough for this, but thank

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

I agree. One lgtm is enough for this, but thanks to John for raising it. /Daniel On 2024-06-06 07:59, Mike Taylor wrote: I will claim that it doesn't, since it's just for 1 more milestone. (if other API OWNERS disagree, now is a great time to chime in!) On 6/6/24 2:30 PM, John Delaney wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

I will claim that it doesn't, since it's just for 1 more milestone. (if other API OWNERS disagree, now is a great time to chime in!) On 6/6/24 2:30 PM, John Delaney wrote: Thanks Mike. I should have included this in the original email, but the initial I2E for this feature needed 3 LGTMs as it w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

Thanks Mike. I should have included this in the original email, but the initial I2E for this feature needed 3 LGTMs as it was a non-standard experiment. Does this extension also require 3? Thanks again! On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 1:00 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM to extend one more milestone (M126)

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Cookie Deprecation Label

LGTM to extend one more milestone (M126). On 6/5/24 11:57 PM, John Delaney wrote: We would like to extend the Cookie Deprecation Label experimental feature being used for Chrome Facilitated Testing.  This feature previously received approval to run through the end of M125 (ending roughly Jun