Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: The Nested Declarations Rule

2024-09-04 Thread Anders Hartvoll Ruud
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 11:06 AM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 1:54 AM Daniel Clark wrote: > >> The stated answer to “Will this feature be supported on all six Blink >> platforms” is “No”, but I’d expect this to be the same on all platforms – >> is that right? >> > > Yes, t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: The Nested Declarations Rule

2024-08-08 Thread Anders Hartvoll Ruud
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 5:26 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > Can you flip the "testing" bit in the chromestatus entry? (and mark it > with "n/a" if that's the case) > I will, as soon as the tests actually exist. > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 4:31 PM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> LGTM3 >> >> On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: The Nested Declarations Rule

2024-08-07 Thread Yoav Weiss (@Shopify)
Can you flip the "testing" bit in the chromestatus entry? (and mark it with "n/a" if that's the case) On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 4:31 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM3 > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, 6:05 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) > wrote: > >> LGTM2 >> >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 3:02 PM Philip Jägenstedt

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: The Nested Declarations Rule

2024-08-06 Thread Chris Harrelson
LGTM3 On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, 6:05 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 3:02 PM Philip Jägenstedt > wrote: > >> LGTM1, this is important to do sooner rather than later, so that the >> current behavior is not locked in by site compat. Thank you for finding a >> solutio

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: The Nested Declarations Rule

2024-08-06 Thread Yoav Weiss (@Shopify)
LGTM2 On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 3:02 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > LGTM1, this is important to do sooner rather than later, so that the > current behavior is not locked in by site compat. Thank you for finding a > solution that's acceptable to everyone! > > Given that this was discussed extensively

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: The Nested Declarations Rule

2024-08-06 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
LGTM1, this is important to do sooner rather than later, so that the current behavior is not locked in by site compat. Thank you for finding a solution that's acceptable to everyone! Given that this was discussed extensively in the CSSWG, I don't think we need to wait further on vendor positions.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: The Nested Declarations Rule

2024-08-02 Thread Anders Hartvoll Ruud
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 1:54 AM Daniel Clark wrote: > The stated answer to “Will this feature be supported on all six Blink > platforms” is “No”, but I’d expect this to be the same on all platforms – > is that right? > Yes, that was a mistake. > > > Could you elaborate a bit on why this might n

RE: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: The Nested Declarations Rule

2024-08-01 Thread 'Daniel Clark' via blink-dev
The stated answer to "Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms" is "No", but I'd expect this to be the same on all platforms - is that right? Could you elaborate a bit on why this might not be doable behind a flag? -- Dan From: Anders Hartvoll Ruud Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2