Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

Thanks Zainab! My concerns were indeed addressed: * On the interop front, the team showed willingness to collaborate with other browsers/engines on a more accurate, but not-necessarily-public list. * My concerns regarding the appeal process were addressed by the team's willingness to revise the pr

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

Some of the team met with Yoav to discuss his concerns, primarily those around list interop and inquiries/appeals coming from 3rd party scripts hosted on CDNs. For those interested in list interop, we plan to propose a breakout session at TPAC on the topic, and look forward to collaborating with o

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

(sorry for previous typos) Per today's API OWNERS meeting, this intent is being held until Yoav's questions are resolved. I don't expect that this will be delayed long, and stakeholders will meet soon and update this thread with resolutions. Best, Alex On Wednesday, July 23, 2025 at 7:42:41 A

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

Some questions I asked on the I2E are still left unanswered. Overall, I think this feature will cause interop issues *by definition*, at least for the 57 domains on the list that are marked as "some URLs are affect

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

Ok, it sounds like you're asking for something conceptually similar to https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/web-platform/tracking-prevention? I think we can pull that together. Thanks for the suggestion! -mike On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 4:00 PM Alex Russell wrote: > Nothing first tha

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

Nothing first that I'm not asking from an Edge perspective (we have the resources to follow along with most things y'all do), a sketch for how a small browser might implement bloxking using the same list y'all do would be enough for me. Thanks! On Tue, Jul 22, 2025, 11:47 AM Mike West wrote: >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

Hey Alex! Thanks for your feedback (and LGTM :) )! On documentation: we have a PR up against Fetch at https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1840 which aims to clarify the timing and web-facing impact of a blocking decision, and the list of affected domains is up at https://github.com/GoogleChrome/i

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

I remain concerned that this behaviour isn't going to be shared by other Chromium-based browsers. Web Platform behaviour differences between our implementations opens up risks of ongoing divergence, and so I'm going to LGTM3 on the condition that documentation is produced for other embedders th

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

LGTM2 On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 5:55 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > Ok, thanks for clarifying. > > LGTM1 > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 8:51 AM 'Zainab Rizvi' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Hi Chris! We will have a few UI indicators when a resource is blocked: >> >> 1. The "eye" i

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

Ok, thanks for clarifying. LGTM1 On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 8:51 AM 'Zainab Rizvi' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Chris! We will have a few UI indicators when a resource is blocked: > > 1. The "eye" icon will show up in the Omnibox that will allow users to > disable the feature

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

Hi Chris! We will have a few UI indicators when a resource is blocked: 1. The "eye" icon will show up in the Omnibox that will allow users to disable the feature on a particular top-level site. 2. There is a toggle in settings for users to disable the feature entirely. 3. For developers, a dedicat

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

In case of something breaking: When a script is blocked, is the user able to find that out in a site settings dialog? On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 7:59 AM 'Zainab Rizvi' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Yes, though Script Blocking in Incognito would have the same observable > effect as

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

Yes, though Script Blocking in Incognito would have the same observable effect as extensions that block resources, such as ad blockers. The team is also adding monitoring to see if incognito detectability is on the rise due to these features. On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 7:23 PM Gregg Tavares wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

Does this enable more detection of incognito mode by sites? On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 1:08 PM 'Zainab Rizvi' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi, Alex! This will only be enabled for Chrome's Incognito mode. > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 2:19 PM Alex Russell > wrote: > >> Will this be

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

Hi, Alex! This will only be enabled for Chrome's Incognito mode. On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 2:19 PM Alex Russell wrote: > Will this be enabled for all Chromium browsers by default? > > On Monday, July 14, 2025 at 8:54:57 AM UTC-7 riz...@google.com wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> riz...@google.com,

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

Will this be enabled for all Chromium browsers by default? On Monday, July 14, 2025 at 8:54:57 AM UTC-7 riz...@google.com wrote: > Contact emails > > riz...@google.com, mk...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/script-blocking > > Specification > > https://gi