Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

Great! I'll work on shipping then! Thanks, Jun On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 1:19 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > You have 3 LGTMs, so there is no need to delay shipping. Please proceed. > > thanks, > Mike > On 3/19/25 4:11 PM, Jun Kokatsu wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've file a TAG review >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

You have 3 LGTMs, so there is no need to delay shipping. Please proceed. thanks, Mike On 3/19/25 4:11 PM, Jun Kokatsu wrote: Hi All, I've file a TAG review more than a month ago, but I'm yet to get a response. Should I wait until the TAG

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

Hi All, I've file a TAG review more than a month ago, but I'm yet to get a response. Should I wait until the TAG review is complete? Or is filing enough for shipping this feature? Thanks, Jun On Wednesday, January 29, 2025 at 8:08:15 AM

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

LGTM3 On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 7:53 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: > LGTM2. I think this is a useful improvement over permission policy > violation reporting > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 10:15:57 AM UTC-5 Mike Taylor wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> On 1/27/25 6:27 PM, 'Jun Kokatsu' via blink-dev wrote: >>

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

LGTM2. I think this is a useful improvement over permission policy violation reporting On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 10:15:57 AM UTC-5 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM1 > On 1/27/25 6:27 PM, 'Jun Kokatsu' via blink-dev wrote: > > On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 6:45:39 PM UTC-8 Domenic Denicola wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

LGTM1 On 1/27/25 6:27 PM, 'Jun Kokatsu' via blink-dev wrote: On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 6:45:39 PM UTC-8 Domenic Denicola wrote: On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 7:42:03 AM UTC+9 Jun Kokatsu wrote: Contact emailsjkok...@google.com Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/w

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 6:45:39 PM UTC-8 Domenic Denicola wrote: On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 7:42:03 AM UTC+9 Jun Kokatsu wrote: Contact emailsjkok...@google.com Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/pull/546 Summary Introduces a new violation type call

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 7:42:03 AM UTC+9 Jun Kokatsu wrote: Contact emailsjkoka...@google.com Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/pull/546 Summary Introduces a new violation type called "Potential Permissions Policy violation", which will only look at Perm

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

Sorry, forgot to include how a violation report looks like: ``` { "age": 0, "body": { "allowAttribute": "camera", "disposition": "enforce", "message": "Potential permissions policy violation: camera is not allowed in this document.", "policyId": "camera" }, "type": "potent

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

Explainer Potential Permissions Policy violation report triggers when Permissions Policy (or report-only) is enforced on a document, where iframe has an allow attribute which conflicts with the Permissions Policy specified by the header. Unlike Permissions Policy violations, Potential Permissions

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

An explainer (even an inline one) and pointers to the relevant spec sections would be very helpful when reviewing this intent. Thanks! :) On Thursday, January 16, 2025 at 11:42:03 PM UTC+1 Jun Kokatsu wrote: > Contact emailsjkoka...@google.com > > Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/webappsec-pe