[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

2025-05-21 Thread Alex Russell
Per David's last update in the Platform Status tool, LGTM1 On Wednesday, April 16, 2025 at 3:21:12 PM UTC-7 obr...@igalia.com wrote: > > I'm inclined to get things into the world > > I'm inclined to not hurry to get things into the world, specially since > you warned the CSSWG that you may block

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

2025-05-21 Thread Daniel Bratell
LGTM3 /Daniel On 2025-05-21 17:10, Vladimir Levin wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 11:10:20 AM UTC-4 Alex Russell wrote: Per David's last update in the Platform Status tool, LGTM1 On Wednesday, April 16, 2025 at 3:21:12 PM UTC-7 obr...@igalia.com wrote: > I'm i

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

2025-05-21 Thread Vladimir Levin
LGTM2 On Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 11:10:20 AM UTC-4 Alex Russell wrote: > Per David's last update in the Platform Status tool, LGTM1 > > On Wednesday, April 16, 2025 at 3:21:12 PM UTC-7 obr...@igalia.com wrote: > >> > I'm inclined to get things into the world >> >> I'm inclined to not hurry to

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

2025-04-16 Thread obr...@igalia.com
> I'm inclined to get things into the world I'm inclined to not hurry to get things into the world, specially since you warned the CSSWG that you may block refinements after shipping ( https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/GISQbW0Xhxg/m/h4rarOM2BgAJ ). But well, let's see how Da

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

2025-04-16 Thread 'David Grogan' via blink-dev
FWIW, I intend to attempt to implement the behavior described in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11784#issuecomment-2734854579 real soon now. If implementing turns out to be feasible and doesn't uncover any inconsistencies then we're fine with switching to the new behavior. Thanks for t

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

2025-04-15 Thread Alex Russell
I don't see progress in the linked bug from the CSS WG F2F in NY. Should we keep holding this? I'm inclined to get things into the world if they've been well-designed and there is developer interest. Best, Alex On Monday, March 10, 2025 at 5:45:04 AM UTC-7 obr...@igalia.com wrote: > I think i

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS 'stretch' sizing keyword

2025-03-10 Thread obr...@igalia.com
I think it would be good to wait for the CSSWG to clarify things like https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11784 before shipping. El dia dissabte, 8 de març del 2025 a les 2:59:22 UTC+1, David Grogan va escriure: > Contact emailsdgr...@chromium.org > > ExplainerBehaves as 100%, except it