Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Short-circuiting var(), attr()

LGTM3; +1 to Yoav's thanks re: the thorough analysis. On Wednesday, May 7, 2025 at 7:59:03 AM UTC-7 Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM2 > > Thank you for the thorough analysis!! Let's break this vicious cycle! > (before it's too late) > > On Wednesday, May 7, 2025 at 4:38:43 PM UTC+2 Daniel Bratell wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Short-circuiting var(), attr()

LGTM2 Thank you for the thorough analysis!! Let's break this vicious cycle! (before it's too late) On Wednesday, May 7, 2025 at 4:38:43 PM UTC+2 Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM1 And now I've learned about impossible things you can (or could) do with CSS. I'm not sure that was a good thing. /Danie

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Short-circuiting var(), attr()

LGTM1 And now I've learned about impossible things you can (or could) do with CSS. I'm not sure that was a good thing. /Daniel On 2025-05-07 11:12, Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: Contact emails andr...@chromium.org Explainer When designing the if()

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Short-circuiting var(), attr()

Contact emails andr...@chromium.org Explainer When designing the if() function, we (CSSWG) decided to make it short-circuiting , such that we can stop evaluation once a matching condition is fo