Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS 'ic' Length Unit

we support the spec change, but since it won't have any impact on implementation details we'll continue to ship in parallel with spec consideration We support the spec change, but since it won't have any impact on implementation details we'll continue to ship in parallel with the spec consideration

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS 'ic' Length Unit

Thank you for sharing! On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 5:50 AM 一丝 wrote: > Discussion on Chinese social media see: > https://twitter.com/yisibl/status/1555391638876274688 > I used Google Translate to make it easier to read. > [image: FZXca3iUYAAr1kn.jpeg] > 在2022年8月10日星期三 UTC+8 02:47:21 写道： > >> Hi Yunf

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS 'ic' Length Unit

Discussion on Chinese social media see: https://twitter.com/yisibl/status/1555391638876274688 I used Google Translate to make it easier to read. [image: FZXca3iUYAAr1kn.jpeg] 在2022年8月10日星期三 UTC+8 02:47:21 写道： > Hi Yunfei, > > The currently specified behavior has already shipped in Firefox and >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS 'ic' Length Unit

Hi Yunfei, The currently specified behavior has already shipped in Firefox and Safari. If this is going to change, it's important that all browsers make the change, so that we don't end up with non-interoperable behavior. Do you know of any fonts where 水 and 永 have different widths? Also curious

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS 'ic' Length Unit

Given this was rejected last time it was discussed in the csswg, it doesn't seem likely it will change this time? On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 5:54 PM 紫云飞 wrote: > Please hold shipping (if necessary) until this spec issue resolved > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7577 > > 在2022年8月6日星期六 UTC

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS 'ic' Length Unit

Please hold shipping (if necessary) until this spec issue resolved https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7577 在2022年8月6日星期六 UTC+8 00:45:05 写道： > LGTM🎉 > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 10:27 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > >> LGTM3 >> >> /Daniel >> On 2022-08-05 07:47, Yoav Weiss wrote: >> >> LGTM2 >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS 'ic' Length Unit

LGTM🎉 On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 10:27 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM3 > > /Daniel > On 2022-08-05 07:47, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > LGTM2 > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 12:08 AM slightlyoff via Chromestatus < > admin+slightly...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> -- >> You received this messag

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS 'ic' Length Unit

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2022-08-05 07:47, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 12:08 AM slightlyoff via Chromestatus > wrote: LGTM1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS 'ic' Length Unit

LGTM2 On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 12:08 AM slightlyoff via Chromestatus < admin+slightly...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > LGTM1 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "blink-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS 'ic' Length Unit

LGTM1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chro

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS 'ic' Length Unit

Contact emailsfuth...@chromium.org, ko...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#ic Summary Support for expressing CSS lengths relative to the used advance measure of the CJK water ideograph. Motivation Allow authors to size elements to fit a given number o