Sorry this has fallen off my radar a bit. I’m not sure I’m going to have time
to get this resolved soon, so perhaps this can be considered paused unless
anyone else is able to pick it up?
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025, at 7:09 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
> How's it going? Any updates?
>
> On Monday, March 17
How's it going? Any updates?
On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 11:39:47 AM UTC-7 Keith Cirkel wrote:
> None yet, I’ve got to rework some of the internals but got a little busy.
> I’ll hopefully have some updates in the coming weeks!
>
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, at 6:07 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
>
> Any upd
None yet, I’ve got to rework some of the internals but got a little busy. I’ll
hopefully have some updates in the coming weeks!
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, at 6:07 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
> Any updates?
>
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 8:04:33 AM UTC-8 Keith Cirkel wrote:
>> __
>> Not yet, I'll la
Any updates?
On Wednesday, January 22, 2025 at 8:04:33 AM UTC-8 Keith Cirkel wrote:
> Not yet, I'll land a few patches this week that will tidy up the points
> Rune raised.
>
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2025, at 4:02 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote:
>
> Hi Keith, is this intent ready for re-review?
>
> On Tue,
Not yet, I'll land a few patches this week that will tidy up the points Rune
raised.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025, at 4:02 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote:
> Hi Keith, is this intent ready for re-review?
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 5:40 AM Rune Lillesveen wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 7:38 PM Keith Cirke
Hi Keith, is this intent ready for re-review?
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 5:40 AM Rune Lillesveen
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 7:38 PM Keith Cirkel
> wrote:
>
>> > I don't see that the spec says anything about querySelector, but its
>> evaluation depends on slot assignments. Should dirty slot a
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 7:38 PM Keith Cirkel
wrote:
> > I don't see that the spec says anything about querySelector, but its
> evaluation depends on slot assignments. Should dirty slot assignments be
> updated before running querySelector?
>
> Thanks Rune, I think you're right, we should definite
> Is there any reason this isn't behind a flag?
Apologies Mike, I've edited the feature status to reflect that it is indeed
behind a flag right now. It's in the Experimental Web Platform Features group
and has been since M131.
> I don't see that the spec says anything about querySelector, but i
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 10:37 AM Chromestatus <
ad...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> Contact emails chrom...@keithcirkel.co.uk, keitha...@github.com
>
> Explainer https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scoping/#the-has-slotted-pseudo
>
> Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scoping/#the-has-slotte
This looks useful, and it seems that Mozilla is positive on it as well
(inferring from the comments, anyways).
On 1/9/25 4:37 AM, Chromestatus wrote:
Contact emails
chrom...@keithcirkel.co.uk, keitha...@github.com
Explainer
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scoping/#the-has-slo
Contact emails
chrom...@keithcirkel.co.uk, keitha...@github.com
Explainer
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scoping/#the-has-slotted-pseudo
Specification
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scoping/#the-has-slotted-pseudo
Summary
The :has-slotted pseudo class represents a slot element with slotted conte
11 matches
Mail list logo
