[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

Contact emails...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-promise-integration/blob/main/proposals/js-promise-integration/Overview.md Specification https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-promise-integration/blob/main/proposals/js-promise-integration/Overview.md Design docs https://doc

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

Contact emails f...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-promise-integration/blob/main/proposals/js-promise-integration/Overview.md Specification https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-promise-integration/blob/main/proposals/js-promise-integration/Overview.md Design docs https

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

LGTM to experiment for 3 more milestones. Also: I asked Francis offline about the "soft launch in 126", and he clarified that it means we currently support both the new and promise integration APIs in the OT (which is possible because they happen not to have namespace collisions), so that OT parti

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 12:47 PM Rick Byers wrote: > Hi Francis, > We only do OT extensions for 3 milestones at a time >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

The new API is actually a simplification of the 'old' API. It is not a question of base+extensions. Note: the API design itself is gated by the WebAssembly stacks sub-group of the W3C community group. On Monday, June 24, 2024 at 2:44:56 PM UTC-7 sligh...@chromium.org wrote: > Like Rick, I'm al

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

Like Rick, I'm also unsure why this isn't an I2S for the new design. Are y'all really unsure that the latest iteration has open issues that need resolution before shipping? Is there an minimum-viable subset you can ship now while extensions are debated behind another OT? Best, Alex On Mon, Jun 2

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

I am 'ok' with a shorter extension. I asked for 6 months because I foresee a reasonable risk of needing more than 3 milestones. I am not 'ok' with shipping without the imprimatur of progress in the standardization. We recently did ship a phase 3 standard -- exceptions -- that turned out to be a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

Hi Francis, We only do OT extensions for 3 milestones at a time

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

Contact emails...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-promise-integration/blob/main/proposals/js-promise-integration/Overview.md Specification https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-promise-integration/blob/main/proposals/js-promise-integration/Overview.md Design docs https://doc