Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Minor WebCodecs spec violations

Removal has landed in 99.0.4844.0. Thanks everyone! Chris On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 3:30 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > I don't think we require any more mails, but sending a heads-up to the > thread when the removal actually happens may be a useful service. > > /Daniel > On 2022-01-08 00:16, Chris Cu

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Minor WebCodecs spec violations

I don't think we require any more mails, but sending a heads-up to the thread when the removal actually happens may be a useful service. /Daniel On 2022-01-08 00:16, Chris Cunningham wrote: Thanks everyone. The CL to adjust the deprecation message was merged to 98. I'll will remove in 99 per

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Minor WebCodecs spec violations

Thanks everyone. The CL to adjust the deprecation message was merged to 98. I'll will remove in 99 per our plan. What additional emails would you'd like me to send to blink-dev for this deprecation? The process at https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features mentions emails for steps "2. De

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Minor WebCodecs spec violations

LGTM3 On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 9:02 PM 'Chris Cunningham' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > > Thanks Mike, > > > LGTM1 if we can change the deprecation message to "is deprecated". > > CL is out for review > . All > o

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Minor WebCodecs spec violations

Thanks Mike, > LGTM1 if we can change the deprecation message to "is deprecated". CL is out for review . All of the OWNERS are OOO until the new year, but 98 doesn't promote to Beta until Jan 6... could still work out. Best,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Minor WebCodecs spec violations

LGTM2 On Mon, Dec 20, 2021, 6:41 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > On 12/19/21 7:03 PM, Chris Cunningham wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > > And the proposed change here is to remove temporalLayderId as a > top-level key on EncodedVideoChunkMetadata, right? > > That's right. > > > The proposed change here is to sta

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Minor WebCodecs spec violations

On 12/19/21 7:03 PM, Chris Cunningham wrote: Hi Mike, > And the proposed change here is to remove temporalLayderId as a top-level key on EncodedVideoChunkMetadata, right? That's right. > The proposed change here is to start throwing without a timestamp key in the VideoFrameInit dictionary,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Minor WebCodecs spec violations

Hi Mike, > And the proposed change here is to remove temporalLayderId as a top-level key on EncodedVideoChunkMetadata, right? That's right. > The proposed change here is to start throwing without a timestamp key in the VideoFrameInit dictionary, for all "image" types except VideoFrame and HTMLVi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Minor WebCodecs spec violations

Hi Chris, On 12/17/21 3:24 PM, Chris Cunningham wrote: Contact emails * chcunning...@chromium.org * Explainer * https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/blob/main/explainer.md * Specification * htt

[blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Minor WebCodecs spec violations

Contact emails *chcunning...@chromium.org *Explainer *https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/blob/main/explainer.md *Specification *https://w3c.github.io/webcodecs/ *Summary *We've identified two areas wh