Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Aligning Resource Timing's `nextHopProtocol` attribute with the specs

ugfix rather than an intent-to-ship. +Joe Medley >> so that this change can be noted in the next beta >> blog post. >> >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:56 AM Tom McKee wrote: >> >>> >>> I had assumed RUM providers wouldn't need to be notified but was

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Aligning Resource Timing's `nextHopProtocol` attribute with the specs

ment the same behavior already? > * Will RUM providers need to be notified? > * In what milestone will this be shipped? > * I assume that the behavior you're implementing is already specified and > tested in WPT? > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:10 AM Tom McKee wrote: > &

[blink-dev] PSA: Aligning Resource Timing's `nextHopProtocol` attribute with the specs

Howdy! I'm working to land a CL to fix crbug.com/1284631 to better align our implementation of Resource Timing with the Resource Timing and Fetch specs. The result of this change will affect al