Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: X-Requested-With in WebView

2023-03-14 Thread 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev
for approval to start the deprecation trial >>>>> and change the header to become opt-in for non-trial-participants, with >>>>> the >>>>> understanding that this will be an ongoing trial with no set end-date. >>>>> >>>>> W

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: X-Requested-With in WebView

2023-02-24 Thread 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev
18:22, Mike Taylor >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm a big fan of removing passive fingerprinting signals, so thanks for >>>> driving this work. Just a few questions: >>>> >>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=960720#

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: X-Requested-With in WebView

2023-01-05 Thread 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev
/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=960720#c2 stated >>> that "changing the default behaviour would be a significant compatibility >>> risk" - I assume your team is going to publish some migration guidance for >>> developers to reduce the risk. Can you confirm? >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: X-Requested-With in WebView

2022-12-21 Thread 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev
>> Could you give more details on the plans there? (I don't recall seeing a >> "Request for Deprecation Trial" for that, but I'm bad at email...) >> >> Can you also clarify your proposed timelines (for the deprecation trial, >> and removal)? >&g

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: X-Requested-With in WebView

2022-12-21 Thread 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev
ines (for the deprecation trial, > and removal)? > > thanks, > Mike > > On 12/19/22 12:13 PM, 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev wrote: > > Hi Rick, > > Yes - removal is part of the goal here. > > Sincerely, > [image: Google Logo] > Peter Birk Pa

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: X-Requested-With in WebView

2022-12-19 Thread 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev
'deprecated'), is that right? > > If so, LGTM1. > > There may still be some compat and developer messaging risks, but the > WebView team (of which Peter is a member) are the right experts to navigate > those. > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 5:18 AM 'Peter B

[blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: X-Requested-With in WebView

2022-12-19 Thread 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev
Contact emails pb...@google.com Explainer None Specification Summary Removes the default X-Requested-With header from HTTP requests made by WebView. The X-Requested-With header is set by WebView, with the package name of the embedding apk as the value. This use of the header will be discont

[blink-dev] Origin Trial on WebView moving to 10% stable roll-out

2022-09-01 Thread 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev
Hello blink-dev, The Finch experiment to enable Origin Trial support on WebView will be moving to 10% of the stable population after showing no issues at 1% in M104. While the recommendation is to let trials be enabled on WebView along with other platforms, I will be adding instructions to https:

Re: [blink-dev] WebView Origin Trials enabled on 103 beta

2022-06-29 Thread 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev
in question requires implementation in the embedder, then it's >>>>>> still >>>>>> possible to simply not provide any implementation for the WebView >>>>>> embedder, >>>>>> which will make the trial a no-op on that platform. &g

Re: [blink-dev] WebView Origin Trials enabled on 103 beta

2022-06-29 Thread 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev
that means it will be enabled on WebView when the feature >>>> launches, and in my opinion it would be better to have the feature tested >>>> before launching it, which is not happening today. >>>> >>>> Sincerely, >>>> [image: Google

Re: [blink-dev] WebView Origin Trials enabled on 103 beta

2022-06-28 Thread 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev
207469%20379358> >> >> >> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 17:59, Christian Biesinger < >> cbiesin...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> Can you just clarify -- will a platform of "Android" enable an OT on >>> webview as well? If yes is there a way n

Re: [blink-dev] WebView Origin Trials enabled on 103 beta

2022-06-27 Thread &#x27;Peter Birk Pakkenberg&#x27; via blink-dev
17:59, Christian Biesinger wrote: > Can you just clarify -- will a platform of "Android" enable an OT on > webview as well? If yes is there a way not to do that? > > Christian > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 7:16 AM 'Peter Birk Pakkenberg' via blink-dev < > bl

[blink-dev] WebView Origin Trials enabled on 103 beta

2022-06-24 Thread &#x27;Peter Birk Pakkenberg&#x27; via blink-dev
Hello blink-dev@ We have now enabled origin trials on WebView for 103 beta. We aim to enable it on the stable channel in 104. Please note that due to the limited beta channel penetration for WebView, you may not see much traffic on your trials yet. Sincerely, [image: Google Logo] Peter Birk Pakk

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Enable Origin Trial support on Android WebView

2022-04-12 Thread &#x27;Peter Birk Pakkenberg&#x27; via blink-dev
Hi Joe, The 14 trials I listed all target Android, which also includes WebView. So far they haven't been active on WebView because origin trials haven't been enabled, but once we do enable the origin t

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Enable Origin Trial support on Android WebView

2022-04-12 Thread &#x27;Peter Birk Pakkenberg&#x27; via blink-dev
Hi Joe, Yes, we are planning to start the roll out once M102 has launched on Stable. Sincerely, [image: Google Logo] Peter Birk Pakkenberg Software Engineer pb...@google.com +447469379358 On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 at 18:42, Joe Medley wrote: > Peter, > > Do you know any release/availability dates y

[blink-dev] Intent to Enable Origin Trial support on Android WebView

2022-04-07 Thread &#x27;Peter Birk Pakkenberg&#x27; via blink-dev
Hello blink-dev@ We are hoping to begin rolling out origin trial support on WebView. The goal is to ensure that the origins who wish to test new Blink features can reach users in Android WebView as well. Launch Bugs http://crbug.com/1186236 http://crbug.com/1308425 (internal launch bug) Summary