Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Web Speech API contextual biasing

t be desirable - but curious if that was considered. >>>> >>>> Also, the ergonomics of modifying the phrase list seems inconvenient >>>> (if it is an intended use case) - e.g. unboost and boost a specific phrase >>>> would require a sweep to find the ph

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Web Speech API contextual biasing

se list seems inconvenient (if >> it is an intended use case) - e.g. unboost and boost a specific phrase >> would require a sweep to find the phrase if I am understanding the >> explainer correctly.. >> >> (Likely something the TAG might bring up too) >> >> On J

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Web Speech API contextual biasing

Sounds good, I've opened a TAG issue for this here: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1121 Please let me know if you have any other feedback! On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 11:28 AM Dan Clark wrote: > Thanks for these updates! > > I think it's kind of borderline whether there's enough co

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add MediaStreamTrack support to the Web Speech API

;> conflicting on some devices)? >>> >>> >>> ☆*PhistucK* >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 6:34 PM Chris Harrelson >>> wrote: >>> >>>> LGTM1 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 3:48

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Web Speech API contextual biasing

Hi Dan, Thank you for the thoughtful feedback. Addressing your points: *Design Doc Access:* The original document contains some internal information that can't be shared. I've created a public version of the design document that you can access here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CBH4r6rxSry

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

Hi all, The spec changes have been merged and are live! https://webaudio.github.io/web-speech-api/ I believe this should be ready for Blink owners to take another look. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Evan On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 10:33 AM Evan Liu wrote: > Hi! We discuss

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

Hi! We discussed this at the Audio Working Group and reached a consensus :) I have a PR out to update the spec and another one to update the explainer with the changes. I believe this should

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

It would definitely be better to make this change before the feature ships, but it's up to y'all Blink owners if you think this should be a blocker for this intent. The Audio Working Group is meeting tomorrow morning so hopefully we'll be able to reach a consensus then! On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 8:0

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

Hi all, Thanks for the thorough review! I've opened a GitHub issue for the remaining request. Hopefully we'll settle on an option before the next Audio Working Group meeting on 5/15! I'll update the spec as soon as we do. Thanks, Evan On W

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

Hi Alex, Sure, if adding support for these two options would make the API easier to approve, then we might as well include it! Thanks, Evan On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 11:09 AM Alex Russell wrote: > Does "trivial" mean "possible within the scope of this Intent"? Or does > that mean it will need to

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

Hi Domenic, On-device Web Speech supports phrases list, continuous, and all of the audio events. Support for interimResults and maxAlternatives isn't implemented at this time, but adding it would be trivial. Thanks, Evan On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 9:34 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > Hi Evan, > > Ca

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

Hi Dan, For the second one, yes this change would be made prior to shipping. The second two changes might be a little more controversial, so I was planning on making those changes in subsequent PRs. Thanks, Evan On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 11:42 AM 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org>

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

Hi all, We discussed the TAG feedback at the Audio Working Group meeting yesterday and I've posted our response here: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1038#issuecomment-2815982645 Please let me know if anyone has any questions/comments/concerns. I don't think there's any particula

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

Thanks for the detailed feedback, Jeffrey! We'll discuss this at the Audio Working Group meeting this week and I'll update this thread afterwards. Thanks, Evan On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 9:08 PM Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > FYI, the TAG left comments at > https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issue

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

> > Are you thinking it might be reasonable to ship in M128 (decide by branch > on Apr 28, plan to merge any required changes before May 21)? That sounds like a reasonable target, assuming TAG doesn't propose any significant changes. That said, if you want to, I'm supportive of shipping the unpr

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

t;>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thank you Evan. Given the samples and github hits you've shared, I >>>>>> agree that web compat will constrain us from making breaking changes to >>>>>> the >>>>>> APi wh

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

ernizing the API elsewhere (eg. exposing under a brand new name, or >>> adding duplicate methods for the promise versions), but personally I think >>> that goes too far so I won't withhold my personal LGTM on such an argument. >>> Other API owners may feel differently.

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

> > Have you written web platform tests for it? Have a link? I've added a few so far--WPT coverage for the Web Speech API in general is pretty basic at the moment. I'm planning on adding more comprehensive coverage. Here are the ones relevant to this proposal: https://source.chromium.org/chromium/

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: On-device Web Speech API

> > * Are the resources downloaded partitioned per top-level site? What should > typical download sizes be? This depends on the browser--for Chrome on Windows/Mac/Linux, there's only one instance of each on-device speech recognition language pack and each language pack is ~60MB. The spec doesn't n

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add MediaStreamTrack support to the Web Speech API

Regarding interop support, this change was discussed at TPAC 2024 this year and was supported by Eric Carlson from Apple and Paul Adenot from Mozilla among others. I've submitted requests for formal permissions from Mozilla and WebKit