Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Email Verification Protocol

There's been some discussion recently on chromium-dev@ about a new phone number verification mechanism using flash calls. I'm curious if there's interest in expanding this work on email verification to include both email addresses and phone numbers. Unrelatedly, as someone who hosts their own emai

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: :target-before and :target-after pseudo-classes

Can you please request the other "Prepare to ship" reviews (Privacy, WP Security, etc) in the ChromeStatus entry? -- Dan On Wednesday, September 3, 2025 at 9:11:36 AM UTC-7 sakh...@chromium.org wrote: > Contact emailssakh...@chromium.org > > ExplainerBeing able to select scroll markers befor

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Sticky user activation across same-origin navigations

LGTM3 On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 11:31 AM 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > LGTM2, also conditional on tests being added. Thanks for getting position > requests filed (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1295, > https://github.com/WebKit/standards-position

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Sticky user activation across same-origin navigations

LGTM2, also conditional on tests being added. Thanks for getting position requests filed (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1295, https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/547). -- Dan On Wednesday, September 3, 2025 at 7:16:05 AM UTC-7 sligh...@chromium.org wrote

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Support `download` attribute in SVG element

LGTM2, predicated of course on completing the privacy, security, and debuggability sections within the tool. Best, Alex On Monday, September 8, 2025 at 7:23:11 PM UTC+1 dan...@microsoft.com wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Thursday, September 4, 2025 at 1:04:17 AM UTC-7 Chromestatus wrote: > >> Contact e

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Extend Experiment: Web Authentication immediate mediation

Alright; thanks. LGTM. On Wednesday, September 3, 2025 at 9:54:32 PM UTC+1 Ken Buchanan wrote: > We'd like to give developers some more time to test how well it performs > and provide feedback. > > There is also an ongoing discussion with TAG about the privacy properties, > and a proposal to ch

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU: 'primitive_index' feature

Thanks so much for doing that. LGTM1 On Wednesday, September 3, 2025 at 7:49:21 PM UTC+1 Brandon Jones wrote: > Hey Alex! > > An updated explainer is now hosted at > https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/blob/main/proposals/primitive-index.md. > It's still fairly brief because this is a relatively

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Overscroll Gestures

Contact emails vmp...@chromium.org, fla...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/vmpstr/htmldemos/blob/master/gestures/README.md Specification None Summary This feature adds a set of primitives to allow elements to anchor to overscroll areas of other elements. It further allows these el

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Range syntax for style container queries and if()

Thank you! https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12236 > This is now specified and addressed in

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Local network access restrictions for WebSockets

On 9/4/25 3:23 p.m., Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails hc...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/local-network-access/blob/main/explainer.md#websockets Specification None Summary Restricts the ability to make requests to the user's local

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Removal of X-Requested-With in WebView

Sorry if this is not the right place to ask but I'm curious what the status of this is? I'm on WebView 141 and it is still sending the X-Requested-With header. On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 2:55:38 PM UTC-5 Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM3 > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 1:14 AM Peter Birk Pakkenb

[blink-dev] PSA: Preventing User Dictionary Leaks via ::spelling-error and ::grammar-error CSS Pseudo-Elements Explainer

*Contact Emails* aric...@chromium.org, a...@google.com, la...@chromium.org *Explainer* https://explainers-by-googlers.github.io/user-dictionary-leaks/ *Summary* We want to prevent websites from extracting information about a user’s dictionary using CSS spelling/grammar hint highlights. This is cu