[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Device Bound Session Credentials

2025-08-25 Thread Daniel Rubery
Contact emails drub...@chromium.org, thef...@chromium.org, arn...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-dbsc/blob/main/README.md Specification https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-dbsc Summary A way for websites to securely bind a session to a single device. It will let servers

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: ARIA Notify API

2025-08-25 Thread Chris Harrelson
LGTM3 On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 8:08 PM Alex Russell wrote: > LGTM2; thanks for being so responsive to all the concerns raised to date. > > On Wednesday, August 20, 2025 at 11:37:40 AM UTC-7 janewman via > Chromestatus wrote: > >> The [spec PR](https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2577) has a couple o

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype & Ship: activeViewTransition property on document

2025-08-25 Thread Steve Kobes
Given that the plan for scoped is to expose this property on the scope element, it seems better to have symmetry between the meanings of element.activeViewTransition and document.activeViewTransition, and I don't think we'll ever want more than one active transition for the same scope. If there's

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: echoCancellationMode for getUserMedia()

2025-08-25 Thread Alex Russell
LGTM2. The extension to a property bag carries some compat risk, but presumably that is reduced with the property bag casting to `true`, and all of its values being some version of truthiness? Best, Alex On Monday, August 25, 2025 at 1:55:20 AM UTC-7 Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Fri, Aug

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Digital Credentials API I (presentation support)

2025-08-25 Thread Alex Russell
It's good practice for explainers to remain up-to-date for a lot of reasons, not least of which is that they are the easiest way "in" to a feature for developers until full documentaiton is available (and sometimes well after). It's concerning the TAG has changed its advice, but I don't believe

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Digital Credentials API I (presentation support)

2025-08-25 Thread 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev
LGTM2 On Wednesday, August 20, 2025 at 5:24:48 PM UTC-7 jyas...@chromium.org wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 11:16 AM Alex Russell > wrote: > >> Hey Mohamed, >> >> We generally expect explainers to be updated throughout the life of a >> feature. LGTM1, conditional on the explainer being upda

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype & Ship: activeViewTransition property on document

2025-08-25 Thread Alex Russell
Is there a reason not to make this an array or iterable now? Best, Alex On Thursday, August 21, 2025 at 6:54:35 AM UTC-7 Vladimir Levin wrote: > Here is the spec PR https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/12635 > > Re multiple transitions, there is currently only one possible transition > on

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: ARIA Notify API

2025-08-25 Thread Alex Russell
LGTM2; thanks for being so responsive to all the concerns raised to date. On Wednesday, August 20, 2025 at 11:37:40 AM UTC-7 janewman via Chromestatus wrote: > The [spec PR](https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2577) has a couple of > LGTMs, including an approval from one of the chairs for the Aria

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebRTC Encoded Tansform (V2)

2025-08-25 Thread Guido Urdaneta
Since those tests are included in Interop 2025 I believe we cannot unilaterally make them tentative. However, it is likely that some parts of the generateKeyFrame WPTs will change after the upcoming discussion. Since we are leaving generateKeyFrame out of this launch I think the tentative status of

Re: [blink-dev] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Intent to Ship: Support width and height as presentation attributes on nested elements

2025-08-25 Thread 'Divyansh Mangal' via blink-dev
Hi Domenic, yes, all the points that you mentioned are correct and describe the current state of the I2S perfectly. As for the plans of merging the CSS resolution in a spec, we have already started the communications with relevant people and on that front, we are expected to edit the resolution

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement and Ship: Http cookie prefix

2025-08-25 Thread Yoav Weiss (@Shopify)
Just to close the loop on this, the rename landed and was back-merged into 140. No flags required. Mozilla similarly renamed their implementation. On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 4:44 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > On 8/20/25 10:42 a.m., Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 4:35 PM Mike

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU: 'primitive_index' feature

2025-08-25 Thread Yoav Weiss (@Shopify)
Can you request reviews for security/privacy/etc in chromestatus? On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 10:16 PM Chromestatus < ad...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > Contact emails bajo...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://dawn.googlesource.com/dawn/+/refs/heads/main/docs/tint/extensions/chromium_experi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: echoCancellationMode for getUserMedia()

2025-08-25 Thread Yoav Weiss (@Shopify)
LGTM1 On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 11:18 AM Chromestatus < ad...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > Contact emails o...@google.com, gui...@google.com > > Explainer > https://github.com/guidou/mediacapture-main/blob/master/explainer-echo-cancellation-mode.md > > Specification > https://www.w3.org/TR/m

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebRTC Encoded Tansform (V2)

2025-08-25 Thread Yoav Weiss (@Shopify)
Can the failing tests be renamed to `.tentative` until those discussions settle? On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 7:42 PM Guido Urdaneta wrote: > The multi-browser failures in wpt.fyi are mainly due to their including > features that are still under discussion (SFrame and generateKeyFrame). > SFrame has