Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: ARIA Notify API

On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 2:23 PM 'Jacques Newman' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > My thoughts on those questions: > >1. AriaWG requires at least one implementation and one commitment to >implement before any spec change can be merged, see: process.md > >

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: ARIA Notify API

My thoughts on those questions: 1. AriaWG requires at least one implementation and one commitment to implement before any spec change can be merged, see: process.md. This spec PR is on the agenda for tomorrow’s

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Web Speech API contextual biasing

I don't think there are any technical limitations that would prevent other implementations from conforming to how the behavior is specified in the spec. We can add more WPT test cases for different phrases and boost values, but I would caution against constraining the underlying models too much bec

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Script Blocking in Incognito

(sorry for previous typos) Per today's API OWNERS meeting, this intent is being held until Yoav's questions are resolved. I don't expect that this will be delayed long, and stakeholders will meet soon and update this thread with resolutions. Best, Alex On Wednesday, July 23, 2025 at 7:42:41 A

[blink-dev] Re: Ready for Developer Testing: CSS Masonry

One minor edit: The explainer link should be https://developer.chrome.com/blog/masonry-update

[blink-dev] Ready for Developer Testing: CSS Masonry

Contact emails alma...@microsoft.com, celeste...@microsoft.com, yanlingw...@microsoft.com Explainer https://developer.chrome.com/blog/masonry Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-3 Summa

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ToggleEvent source attribute

Thanks for this. LGTM++ On Wed, Jul 23, 2025, 5:12 PM Joey Arhar wrote: > Thanks! Here is an explainer: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C_mS5jHR4590be4A7HYQU31Hetv6oFmt8yK5QkBLkis/edit?usp=sharing > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:15 PM Domenic Denicola > wrote: > >> LGTM3, but I also believe

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ToggleEvent source attribute

Thanks! Here is an explainer: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C_mS5jHR4590be4A7HYQU31Hetv6oFmt8yK5QkBLkis/edit?usp=sharing On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:15 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > LGTM3, but I also believe a small explainer is a good idea. > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:15 PM Alex Russell >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS find-in-page highlight pseudos

The API Owners discussed this today and had some concerns that the motivation is not as clear as it could be. We'd like to better understand the developer need for styling these highlights. Looking at the Motivation section

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ServiceWorkerStaticRouterTimingInfo

LGTM3 On Wednesday, July 23, 2025 at 5:32:37 PM UTC+2 Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 but make sure that all PRs eventually land so they are not left in > limbo. > > /Daniel > On 2025-07-18 02:45, Keita Suzuki wrote: > > > Are all of the spec PRs for this feature landed? I see some of the items >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: ARIA Notify API

Hi, Two questions: 1. The spec PR is still open, I'd like that to be finished before shipping. 2. The Mozilla position references an incomplete design, but those comments seem old and have been superseded by more recent discussion on the issue. My assumption is that once (1) is finished, the pos

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: View Transitions: Inherit more animation properties

LGTM1 On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 9:53 AM Chromestatus < ad...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > Contact emails vmp...@google.com > > Explainer None > > Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-view-transitions-2 > > Summary > > Similar to https://chromestatus.com/feature/5424291457531904, which > i

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ServiceWorkerStaticRouterTimingInfo

LGTM2 but make sure that all PRs eventually land so they are not left in limbo. /Daniel On 2025-07-18 02:45, Keita Suzuki wrote: > Are all of the spec PRs for this feature landed? I see some of the items you linked to are still open. The ServiceWorker spec has been landed, but the changes on

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: ARIA Notify API

LGTM1 /Daniel On 2025-07-23 00:00, 'Jacques Newman' via blink-dev wrote: *Contact emails* alma...@microsoft.com, janew...@microsoft.com, leo...@microsoft.com *Explainer* https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/Accessibility/AriaNotify/explainer.md *Specification* https

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Web Speech API contextual biasing

How likely are different implementations to implement their reaction to different "boost" values similarly? If I test my game with a "Zoltan" character (from the explainer's examples) in different implementations with the same "boost" values, am I likely to get similar results? On Tuesday, July

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Script Blocking in Incognito

On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 2:39 PM Zainab Rizvi wrote: > My appologies, Yoav. I had a draft response that hadn't sent. > > We have documented an appeals process >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Script Blocking in Incognito

My appologies, Yoav. I had a draft response that hadn't sent. We have documented an appeals process that can be used by domain owners

Re: [blink-dev] [Intent to Prototype] Layout Instability Attribution in CSS Pixels

I do suspect this was more of an oversight than a specific decision, and feedback from developers seems to align with Ane Diaz: most are having to work around this. However, there are clients out there who now depend on this and we are reaching out to see if it's less of a total headache to fix in

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: ServiceWorkerAutoPreload

Contact emailssisidov...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/service-worker-auto-preload Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1756 Summary ServiceWorkerAutoPreload is a mode where the browser issues the network request in parallel with the service worker bootstrap, a