Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent To Ship: Prevent fixed elements from moving during elastic overscroll.

2025-02-18 Thread 'Rahul Arakeri' via blink-dev
Created this bug to investigate it: Overscroll affects fixed elements. [397481062] - Chromium Doesn't repro on Windows, Mac, iOS. Will try to get a hold of an Android device and see if I can repro the issue. Let's continue the discussion on the crbug.

[blink-dev] Setting

2025-02-18 Thread Marcel Wilson
I'm trying to replicate behavior mentioned https://github.com/mui/mui-x/issues/4644#issuecomment-1240691382 where they note that some of the MUI components will only render properly when chrome is configured with the following. --blink-settings=primaryHoverType=2,availableHoverTypes=2,primaryPo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Interpolation progress functional notations: CSS *progress() functions

2025-02-18 Thread Mike Taylor
On 2/18/25 12:15 PM, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails sakha...@chromium.org Explainer None Could you describe what these features allow for (beyond what you have in the summary), maybe with some example code? It's not obvious to me what it means practically to represent

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning :visited links history

2025-02-18 Thread Christian Biesinger
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 12:36 PM Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 5:43 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: >> Couldn't this be tested with reftests? > > > Eh, probably, but possibly with some flakiness. Emilio voiced concern about > assuming a synchronous styling of :visited links (in >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Partitioning :visited links history

2025-02-18 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 5:43 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > Very exciting to see progress on this longstanding problem! > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 3:35 AM Kyra Seevers > wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> kyraseev...@chromium.org, miketa...@chromium.org, a...@google.com >> >> Explainer >> >> >> htt

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Sign-Related Functions: abs(), sign()

2025-02-18 Thread Mike Taylor
On 2/18/25 8:28 AM, Chromestatus wrote: Contact emails sakha...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#sign-funcs Summary The sign-related functions ​abs() and sign() ​compute various functions related to the sign

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS shape() function

2025-02-18 Thread Yoav Weiss (@Shopify)
LGTM3 On Thursday, February 13, 2025 at 9:21:45 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 2/12/25 10:59 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > > Indeed, thanks for working through this! LGTM1. > > On Thursday, February 13, 2025 at 3:28:47 AM UTC+9 Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:07 A

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Interpolation progress functional notations: CSS *progress() functions

2025-02-18 Thread Chromestatus
Contact emails sakha...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#progress Summary The progress(), media-progress(), and container-progress() functional notations represent the proportional distance of a given value (the progress value) from one value

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent To Ship: Prevent fixed elements from moving during elastic overscroll.

2025-02-18 Thread Chris Harrelson
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 8:25 AM Stanislav Ivashkevich < stanislavivashkev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, it seems that behaviour was reintroduced with some recent updates. > Fixed element is moving with overscroll of body, video attached, see > footer. > Hi, could you file a bug at crbug.com/new with

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Summarizer API

2025-02-18 Thread Hrishikesh Kakkad
I want to experiment with the summarizer API On Thursday, 10 October 2024 at 09:54:21 UTC-7 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM to experiment from 131 to 136 inclusive. > On 10/9/24 7:58 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > > Contact emails > > dom...@chromium.org, fer...@chromium.org, kenji...@chromium.org > >

Re: [blink-dev] FYI: Frame rate throttling when no frames are produced

2025-02-18 Thread Li1 Chen
https://issues.chromium.org/issues/337094888 On Friday, February 14, 2025 at 4:26:47 PM UTC+8 uazo wrote: > > We tested an intervention on Canary/Dev/Beta that reduces the frame > rate by half (e.g., from 60fps to 30fps) after 4 consecutive frames without > pixel changes. > > would it be poss

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Sign-Related Functions: abs(), sign()

2025-02-18 Thread Chromestatus
Contact emails sakha...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#sign-funcs Summary The sign-related functions ​abs() and sign() ​compute various functions related to the sign of their argument. The abs(A) function contains one calculation A, and return