Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS caret-animation property

2025-01-27 Thread Domenic Denicola
It looks like on ChromeStatus there was a request to reactivate this review. Can you clarify what is preventing https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/11373 from landing? Do you believe it addresses all of Mozilla's concerns? (And your concerns?) On Thursday, October 31, 2024 at 12:30:37 AM U

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fluent Scrollbars.

2025-01-27 Thread Domenic Denicola
LGTM1. I think it's a bit unclear whether or not this requires an Intent to Ship and API owner approval, but I'm supportive of the conservative path you've taken of sending one and requesting such approval. The analysis about interop and compat that you've provided shows that there are indeed web

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Permissions Policy reports for iframes

2025-01-27 Thread 'Jun Kokatsu' via blink-dev
On Sunday, January 26, 2025 at 6:45:39 PM UTC-8 Domenic Denicola wrote: On Friday, January 17, 2025 at 7:42:03 AM UTC+9 Jun Kokatsu wrote: Contact emailsjkok...@google.com Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/pull/546 Summary Introduces a new violation type call

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

2025-01-27 Thread Francis McCabe
Contact emails...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-promise-integration/blob/main/proposals/js-promise-integration/Overview.md Specification https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-promise-integration/blob/main/proposals/js-promise-integration/Overview.md Design docs https://doc

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS shape() function

2025-01-27 Thread Noam Rosenthal
> >>>- https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10647 >>> >>> This one is not actionable and doesn't affect shape(), it's about path(). >> > > I think "not actionable > " isn't a great > way to describe this issue: Lea's suggesting that t

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS shape() function

2025-01-27 Thread Jeffrey Yasskin
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:08 AM Noam Rosenthal wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:56 AM Domenic Denicola > wrote: > >> This overall seems promising, but a few inline comments. The only >> blocking one is the question about open spec edits. >> >> On Thursday, January 23, 2025 at 4:42:34 AM UTC+9

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fluent Scrollbars.

2025-01-27 Thread Chromestatus
Contact emails arak...@microsoft.com, gast...@microsoft.com Explainer None Specification None Summary This feature modernizes the Chromium scrollbars (both overlay and non-overlay) on Windows and Linux to fit the Windows 11 Fluent design language. Non-overlay Fluent scrollbars will be enab

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS shape() function

2025-01-27 Thread Noam Rosenthal
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 2:56 AM Domenic Denicola wrote: > This overall seems promising, but a few inline comments. The only blocking > one is the question about open spec edits. > > On Thursday, January 23, 2025 at 4:42:34 AM UTC+9 Chromestatus wrote: > > Contact emails nrosent...@chromium.org >