Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API

Thanks both! We had some bandwidth issues on the editor's side with TPAC and other meetings going on, but I'm working with Chris to get this reviewed and merged now. On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 9:12 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > LGTM2. Please work to get the spec PR landed as soon as possible. > > On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Select parser relaxation

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 5:33 AM Joey Arhar wrote: > Contact emailsjar...@chromium.org > > Explainerhttps://open-ui.org/components/customizableselect > > Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10557 > This PR is still getting pretty active review comments. At least some of them seem lik

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM as a trust signal for the Storage Access API

LGTM2. Please work to get the spec PR landed as soon as possible. On Thursday, October 10, 2024 at 6:27:15 AM UTC+9 Alex Russell wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Monday, October 7, 2024 at 10:24:01 AM UTC-7 Chris Fredrickson wrote: > >> Yes, we ran an OT with 15+ registrants. The feedback we got was positiv

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Reverse Origin Trial: Trial for SharedArrayBuffers in non-isolated pages on Desktop platforms

LGTM to extend to 136. The OT team can help you set up the approvals process - we did the same for the Storage Partitioning renewal . It does require a little bit of work up front, but I think it

Re: [blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Relax parser

Good point. I re-filed this as an intent to ship: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/5_9-Qkvlj2M On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 6:53 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > Can you explain more why you think a web-facing change PSA, instead of an > Intent to Ship, is appropriate for this featur

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Select parser relaxation

Contact emailsjar...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://open-ui.org/components/customizableselect Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10557 Summary This change makes the HTML parser allow additional tags in besides , , and . This change is in support of the customizable feature but is

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: allow anchor-size() in inset and margin Properties

Contact emailsfuth...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#anchor-size-fn Summary Allow anchor-size() values for inset and margin properties. Originally, anchor-size() was only allowed in sizing properties. The specification was changed to allo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Summarizer API

LGTM to experiment from 131 to 136 inclusive. On 10/9/24 7:58 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: Contact emails dome...@chromium.org, fer...@chromium.org, kenjibah...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/writing-assistance-apis/blob/main/README.md

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: SVG foreignObject does not taint the canvas for blob URLs

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:36 AM Stephen Chenney wrote: > I'm waiting on the potential security issue to be sorted out on WHATWG. > I'll ping the issue today to try and get resolution at least on the > question of whether it's really a problem. > Sounds good. > Should I set the intent back to a

[blink-dev] Page without titles

Hi, blink team We are working on sharing tab groups among users. To have a better user experience for informing what is being shared, we want to check if anyone has any idea what's the % of pages that doesn't have titles in the source. Also the % of pages that Chrome fall backs to use the URL as

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: SVG foreignObject does not taint the canvas for blob URLs

I'm waiting on the potential security issue to be sorted out on WHATWG. I'll ping the issue today to try and get resolution at least on the question of whether it's really a problem. Should I set the intent back to an earlier phase or remove the request for API Owner review? Cheers, Stephen. On

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS caret-animation property

Contact emails schen...@chromium.org Explainer https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#caret-animation https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9707 Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#caret-animation Summary Chromium supports animation of the caret-color property, but when animated th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Reverse Origin Trial: Trial for SharedArrayBuffers in non-isolated pages on Desktop platforms

Good to know about this new capability. In that case, yes we would prefer to only allow DT renewal for sites with existing registrations. On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 4:37 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > On 10/8/24 8:15 AM, Camille Lamy wrote: > > Contact emails > > v...@chromium.org cl...@chromium.org > > Ex