Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 12:47 PM Rick Byers wrote: > Hi Francis, > We only do OT extensions for 3 milestones at a time >

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Reverse origin trial for Standardized CSS zoom

Contact emailssza...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/9699 Design docs https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AcnDShjT-kEuRaMchZPm5uaIgNZ4OiYtM4JI9qiV8Po/edit Summary Create a reverse origin trial to allow sites to opt out of the "Standardized CSS Z

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

The new API is actually a simplification of the 'old' API. It is not a question of base+extensions. Note: the API design itself is gated by the WebAssembly stacks sub-group of the W3C community group. On Monday, June 24, 2024 at 2:44:56 PM UTC-7 sligh...@chromium.org wrote: > Like Rick, I'm al

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Standardized CSS zoom

Hey all, I recently took over ownership of this project, and I have a couple of updates... - The target launch milestone is now M128. - In addition to the changes in functionality previously discussed, we are going to ship a new DOM Element attribute under the same feature flag: currentCSSZoom <

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

Like Rick, I'm also unsure why this isn't an I2S for the new design. Are y'all really unsure that the latest iteration has open issues that need resolution before shipping? Is there an minimum-viable subset you can ship now while extensions are debated behind another OT? Best, Alex On Mon, Jun 2

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

I am 'ok' with a shorter extension. I asked for 6 months because I foresee a reasonable risk of needing more than 3 milestones. I am not 'ok' with shipping without the imprimatur of progress in the standardization. We recently did ship a phase 3 standard -- exceptions -- that turned out to be a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

Hi Francis, We only do OT extensions for 3 milestones at a time

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Compute Pressure WebDriver endpoints

Thanks - LGTM1 On 6/24/24 11:02 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: Done! Mike Taylor writes: Could you please request reviews for the various review gate bits in your chromestatus entry? (privacy, security, enterprise... etc) On 6/19/24 3:54 AM, Mandy, Arnaud wrote: Contact emails raphael.

[blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Support currentcolor in Relative Color Syntax

Contact emails kbabb...@microsoft.com Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-color-5/#resolving-rcs Design docs https://docs.google.com/document/d/1568wVjrIRbrU9_O37gPu10cj0CDWRiAc6ZMk9t0JpXs/edit Summary Allow relative colors in CSS (using the 'from' keyword) to

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: JavaScript Promise Integration

Contact emails...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-promise-integration/blob/main/proposals/js-promise-integration/Overview.md Specification https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-promise-integration/blob/main/proposals/js-promise-integration/Overview.md Design docs https://doc

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Digital Credential API

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 12:02 PM Alex Russell wrote: > It would be good to see a more thorough considered alternatives section in > the explainer. It's not immediately clear what (in code) the alternatives > would entail. > Sure, we could do that. I filed this issue

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Digital Credential API

It would be good to see a more thorough considered alternatives section in the explainer. It's not immediately clear what (in code) the alternatives would entail. On Mon, Jun 24, 2024, 7:28 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM to experiment for 6 milestones from M128 to M133 inclusive. > On 6/22/24 1:44

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Compute Pressure WebDriver endpoints

Done! Mike Taylor writes: > Could you please request reviews for the various review gate bits in > your chromestatus entry? > > > (privacy, security, enterprise... etc) > > > On 6/19/24 3:54 AM, Mandy, Arnaud wrote: >> Contact emails >> raphael.kubo.da.co...@intel.com >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Compute Pressure WebDriver endpoints

Could you please request reviews for the various review gate bits in your chromestatus entry? (privacy, security, enterprise... etc) On 6/19/24 3:54 AM, Mandy, Arnaud wrote: Contact emails raphael.kubo.da.co...@intel.com , juha.j.vai...@intel.com

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Digital Credential API

LGTM to experiment for 6 milestones from M128 to M133 inclusive. On 6/22/24 1:44 PM, Rick Byers wrote: Hello blink-dev, I'd like to request permission to start an OT for this API. There's still a lot to figure out in the larger space of digital credentials on the web

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Compute Pressure WebDriver endpoints

Complementing what Alex has said, seeking review from the WebDriver WG is not strictly necessary, and since these endpoints are modelled after the Generic Sensor and Device Posture ones it felt like there was no need to involve the WG before starting this Intent thread. As for BiDi support, Alex a