Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Gamepad API Trigger-Rumble Extension

LGTM3. Thanks Yoav for digging in to the WebKit position! On Wednesday, April 17, 2024 at 3:05:22 AM UTC+9 Gabriel Brito wrote: > WebKit decided to implement the feature behind a feature flag by Jan 2023 > for web compat. Since then, we have collaborated at the W3C in the Web Apps > WG and adde

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

Mason, can you confirm that what is shipping is accurately represented by the specification field, i.e., CSS anchor positioning only? In particular, the HTML anchor="" attribute is not included in this I2S? On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 5:01 AM Daniel Herr wro

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: toJSON for GeolocationCoordinates and GeolocationPosition

LGTM3 On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 3:37 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 - seems like a trivial, useful addition. > On 4/16/24 2:02 PM, slightlyoff via Chromestatus wrote: > > LGTM1 > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "blink-dev" group. > To unsubscribe fro

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate: X-Requested-With in WebView

This is not working for me, could you help me with that? I'm using a webview in compose and need to change the X-Requested-With header. thanks! El viernes, 12 de abril de 2024 a las 17:06:31 UTC+2, Jeeva Kumar escribió: > Any one can fake the X-Requested-With header by doing the following, I >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

Thank you all! I really appreciate the feedback and support. Thanks, Mason On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 12:05 PM Rick Byers wrote: > LGTM3 > > There's definitely some forward compat risk here, but we know adoption for > these sorts of features tends to be slow before reaching all engines, so > I'm

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

LGTM3 There's definitely some forward compat risk here, but we know adoption for these sorts of features tends to be slow before reaching all engines, so I'm confident in our ability to make small breaking changes as needed as the spec continues to mature. Seeing how much diligence and review has

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Remove Authorization header upon cross-origin redirect

FWIW, this is already possible in an extension using the devtools protocol support. Fetch.continueRequest lets you rewrite outbound requests to go to different destinations, modify headers, etc. It is what WebP

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Third-party Cookie Grace Period Opt-Out

Contact emails amal...@chromium.org njeu...@chromium.org wanderv...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/explainers-by-googlers/3pcd-grace-period-opt-out Specification TBD Summary This proposal details a new mechanism for site developers to conduct a self-service staged opt-out of the

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Remove Authorization header upon cross-origin redirect

Keep in mind also that cross-origin and same-origin requests generally behave very differently on the web, not just in this specific way. So if you're redirecting a portion of your origin in your dev environment, other things will also behave differently. I recognize that's not how your current dev

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: toJSON for GeolocationCoordinates and GeolocationPosition

LGTM2 - seems like a trivial, useful addition. On 4/16/24 2:02 PM, slightlyoff via Chromestatus wrote: LGTM1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Remove Authorization header upon cross-origin redirect

It's possible that DevTools could support this use case, so I'd encourage you to a feature request at crbug.com/new. Thx On 4/16/24 6:29 AM, Tom Komarnicki wrote: Hi there, Here's the scenario I'm dealing with: I'm a backend developer working on a system with two distinct parts that typicall

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Gamepad API Trigger-Rumble Extension

WebKit decided to implement the feature behind a feature flag by Jan 2023 for web compat. Since then, we have collaborated at the W3C in the Web Apps WG and added both the GamepadHapticActuator API and the trigger-rumble extension to the Gamepad API spec. Apple helped review and approved both sp

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: toJSON for GeolocationCoordinates and GeolocationPosition

LGTM1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chro

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

LGTM1. Excited to see this ship! On Monday, April 15, 2024 at 5:57:40 PM UTC-7 Mason Freed wrote: > Thanks for the detailed reply, fantasai! And also thank you very much for > all of the hard work you and Tab have put into this feature to make it what > it is. We very much appreciate it. > > Mo

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: toJSON for GeolocationCoordinates and GeolocationPosition

Contact emails reil...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://github.com/w3c/geolocation-api/pull/147 (merged but blocked on a publishing error) Summary Add .toJSON() methods to the GeolocationCoordinates and GeolocationPosition interfaces. These methods will aid in developing au

Re: [blink-dev] FYI: Shared Storage API data storage limits updated

Yes, we used UMA metrics to verify that the amount of space is suitable for existing API callers. On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:01 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Have we done any compatibility analysis to understand if this change will > affect sites using Shared Storage? > On 4/15/24 3:49 PM, Cammie Smit

Re: [blink-dev] FYI: Shared Storage API data storage limits updated

Have we done any compatibility analysis to understand if this change will affect sites using Shared Storage? On 4/15/24 3:49 PM, Cammie Smith Barnes wrote: FYI: Shared Storage API data storage limits updated We have updated the Shared Storage API data storage limits in the interest o

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Remove Authorization header upon cross-origin redirect

Hi there, Here's the scenario I'm dealing with: I'm a backend developer working on a system with two distinct parts that typically don't intersect during development. The frontend is hosted online, and that's the only place I can access it. When something goes wrong on the backend I'm developi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Importmap integrity

my take tl;dr is: please proceed with being explicitly aware of the risk of changing import maps concept. This will change the concept of import maps. Currently the import maps are contained within specifier resolution (and separated from loading/fetch-spec-exposed behavior), but after introducing