Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

2024-04-12 Thread Mike Taylor
Thanks Russ. LGTM to extend another 3 milestones. I would like to see draft specifications and progress on making this testable via WPTs, at the very least, before any further extensions are requested. On 4/12/24 2:52 PM, Russ Hamilton wrote: To follow up on my previous email, I’d like to a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

2024-04-12 Thread 'Russ Hamilton' via blink-dev
To follow up on my previous email, I’d like to add some more details to clarify the state and progress of the Origin Trial: In the past 6 months the server has added support for event-level reporting, multiple coordinators, currencies, multi-seller auctions, and hybrid on-device/on-server Protect

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Gamepad API Trigger-Rumble Extension

2024-04-12 Thread Mike Taylor
LGTM2 On 4/12/24 5:16 AM, 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev wrote: Updated the developer-facing gamepad article: https://web.dev/articles/gamepad#the_vibration_actuator. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

2024-04-12 Thread Mike Taylor
Russ and I had a conversation offline about the progress here - mind summarizing, Russ? On 4/9/24 4:12 PM, Russ Hamilton wrote: Specification We are just beginning writing the spec. We're drafting a WICG spec for the browser components and an IETF spec for the server interface.

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-04-12 Thread Mason Freed
On Thursday, April 11, 2024 at 7:58:18 PM UTC-7 dan...@microsoft.com wrote: I'm really excited to see this move forward! Thanks! Me too - exciting after about 4 years of working on it, right? Thanks for all of the help on this, especially early on. For the TAG review

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate: X-Requested-With in WebView

2024-04-12 Thread 'Peter Beverloo' via blink-dev
To be clear, this thread is about *deprecating the header*, not about adding the header or changing its behaviour. Thanks, Peter On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 4:06 PM Jeeva Kumar wrote: > Any one can fake the X-Requested-With header by doing the following, I > could emulate a different app package n

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Web Install API

2024-04-12 Thread 'Diego Gonzalez' via blink-dev
Contact emails luigo...@microsoft.com, amb...@microsoft.com Explainer https://aka.ms/webinstall Specification None Summary The Web Install API allows a web site to install a web app (same or cross domain). This functionality allows t

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate: X-Requested-With in WebView

2024-04-12 Thread Jeeva Kumar
Any one can fake the X-Requested-With header by doing the following, I could emulate a different app package name, so what's the point of this? ```kotlin @HiltAndroidApp class BrowserApp: Application() { override fun getPackageName(): String { try { val stackTrace = Thread.currentThread().stackTr

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Gamepad API Trigger-Rumble Extension

2024-04-12 Thread 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev
Updated the developer-facing gamepad article: https://web.dev/articles/gamepad#the_vibration_actuator. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+uns