Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Form Controls Support Vertical Writing Mode

2024-01-08 Thread Di Zhang
While implementing and shipping Form Control Vertical Writing Mode support, we discovered a discrepancy between Chromium's behavior and the other two engines for vertical sliders. For elements , , with vertical writing-mode, the other two browsers do this: - If direction: ltr, value is rendered

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS custom state new :state() syntax

2024-01-08 Thread TAMURA, Kent
LGTM3. On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 3:11 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > (but please remember to request reviews for the other review gates in > chromestatus) > On 1/3/24 1:10 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: > > LGTM2 > On 1/3/24 12:54 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:44 AM Joey Arhar

[blink-dev] Re: Web-Facing Change PSA: Do not delete File kind objects in dataTransfer.clearData()

2024-01-08 Thread 'Anupam Snigdha' via blink-dev
Making few edits in TAG review and status of Webkit. This change has already shipped in both Firefox and Safari. From: Anupam Snigdha Sent: Monday, January 8, 2024 1:54 PM To: blink-dev@chromium.org Cc: Sanket Joshi (EDGE) ; Palak Bhatia Subject: Web-Facing Cha

[blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Do not delete File kind objects in dataTransfer.clearData()

2024-01-08 Thread 'Anupam Snigdha' via blink-dev
Contact emails sni...@microsoft.com, sa...@microsoft.com, est...@chromium.org, palakbha...@microsoft.com Specification https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/dnd.html#dom-datat

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: FedCM: domain hint and disconnect

2024-01-08 Thread Nicolás Peña
Hey Alex, Thanks for the clarification. We will keep bundling intents that we consider small or non-controversial in the future. Regarding the naming of `disconnect`, we did have the TAG mention no concerns on the API, albeit under the original name of `revoke`. We changed the name to `disco

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Use specific fetch destination for JSON/CSS modules

2024-01-08 Thread Nicolò Ribaudo
Hello, For those looking for the spec diff relative to this change, you can find it in the HTML and Fetch PRs that introduced it: https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9486, https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1691 --- Nicolò Ribaudo On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 2:20:43 PM UTC+1 Nicolò Ribaudo

[blink-dev] Intent to implement and ship: blocking=render on inline scripts

2024-01-08 Thread Noam Rosenthal
Contact emailsnrosent...@chromium.org ExplainerNone (this is a small change to an existing feature) Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10035 Summary Currently

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Use specific fetch destination for JSON/CSS modules

2024-01-08 Thread Nicolò Ribaudo
Contact emails nriba...@igalia.com Explainer None Specification https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#fetch-a-single-module-script Summary CSS and JSON modules will be fetched using a specific fetch destination (either "css" or "json") rather than a generic "script"

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU: read-write storage textures

2024-01-08 Thread 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 11:01 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 14:19 Corentin Wallez wrote: > >> Contact emailscwal...@google.com >> >> ExplainerNone >> >> Specification >> https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/#dom-gpustoragetextureaccess-read-write >> > > Is there a way for developers

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU: read-write storage textures

2024-01-08 Thread Yoav Weiss
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 14:19 Corentin Wallez wrote: > Contact emailscwal...@google.com > > ExplainerNone > > Specification > https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/#dom-gpustoragetextureaccess-read-write > Is there a way for developers to feature detect support for this extra value? > Summary > > Funct