Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Subgrid

LGTM1. Two other browsers already shipped the feature. No doubts about shipping it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Subgrid

Contact emails etha...@microsoft.com Explainer None Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/css-grid-2/#subgrids Design docs https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cpsCmzdDlXUKtMxOUKIoJFyLH54mLVhZnam_z0PriO0/edit?usp=sharing Summary Implements the CSS Grid Layout Mo

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Web Serial support for Bluetooth RFCOMM services

Please see additional details below: Risks Interoperability and Compatibility Web Serial API is only implemented in Chromium. Other browser vendors have expressed negative views regarding the API and are unlikely to implement it. This feature will not affect compatibility in existing apps. The

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: scheduler.yield()

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 7:02 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > Exciting stuff!! > > > The signal inheritance bit [1], however, would need transpilation > support to propagate the current signal across async (Promise) boundaries. > > I couldn't find where this [1] goes. I'm very interested in this gene

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: SoftNavigation performance entry

LGTM to keep going until M115. On 6/14/23 3:13 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: I recently discovered that despite me asking for this to run till M113, the OT is running till M115. The reason I haven't "renewed" the OT after M113 is that lined-up partners took a particularly long time to add support, whic

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture

LGTM3 On 6/14/23 11:47 AM, slightlyoff via Chromestatus wrote: LGTM2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture

LGTM2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chro

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM Improvements: LoginHint, UserInfo, and Context

LGTM3 On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:41 AM slightlyoff via Chromestatus < admin+slightly...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > LGTM2 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "blink-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM Improvements: LoginHint, UserInfo, and Context

LGTM2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chro

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS Upgrades

On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 5:53:49 PM UTC+2 Chris Thompson wrote: On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:41 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: Thanks for working on this! On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 11:44 PM Chris Thompson wrote: Thanks all. Some updates: - We have filed a TAG review request

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Expanded Wildcards in Permissions Policy Origins

LGTM3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chro

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype & Ship: Expanded Wildcards in Permissions Policy Origins

LGTM2 On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:36 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Friday, June 9, 2023 at 8:04:29 PM UTC+2 Ari Chivukula wrote: > >> Done >> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/51#issuecomment-1584956430 >> >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023, 1:57 PM Rick Byers wrote: >> >>> Thanks Ar

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype & Ship: Expanded Wildcards in Permissions Policy Origins

LGTM1 On Friday, June 9, 2023 at 8:04:29 PM UTC+2 Ari Chivukula wrote: > Done > https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/51#issuecomment-1584956430 > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2023, 1:57 PM Rick Byers wrote: > >> Thanks Ari, looks great! >> >> Can you also please post an update to the WebKit

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: EditContext API

LGTM to experiment assuming WPT caveats are addressed. On editing event order, perhaps we can track this separately. Is there a crbug for it? On Tuesday, June 13, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-7 Yoav Weiss wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:03 AM 'Daniel Clark' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.or

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture

LGTM1 Thanks for addressing the `unload` documentation and for your answers! :) On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 11:47 AM François Beaufort wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:55 AM François Beaufort > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:17 AM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Ju

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:55 AM François Beaufort wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 8:17 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 7:25 PM 'Tommy Steimel' via blink-dev < >> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> In the future, we may be able to do something on Android that doesn

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Remove Payment Request User Activation Requirement

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 8:54 PM Nick Burris wrote: > Contact emailsnbur...@chromium.org, smcgr...@chromium.org, > i...@chromium.org > > Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/payment-request/pull/1009 > The PR seems to be a draft. What's preventing us from landing it? Was this discussed in some pub

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: SoftNavigation performance entry

I recently discovered that despite me asking for this to run till M113, the OT is running till M115. The reason I haven't "renewed" the OT after M113 is that lined-up partners took a particularly long time to add support, which resulted in practically no-use for the OTed API (beyond a very small nu