Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: PaymentInstruments

What did you have in mind in terms of a deprecation timeline? Are you planning to pipe that through CountDeprecation to ensure deprecation repo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: font-tech() and font-format() condition extensions to CSS @supports

LGTM1 - thanks for following up on the TAG's feedback! On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 1:47 AM Dominik Röttsches wrote: > Contact emailsdr...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/main/css-conditional-5/font-tech-format-explainer.md > > Specificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: SoftNavigation performance entry

Can you expand more on your concern? Are you afraid that sites will trigger the heuristic frequently, resulting in frequent FCP/LCP reporting, which will reveal paint information of elements impacted by arbitrary cross-origin resource characteristics? On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 4:46 PM Arthur Hemery

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Web Payment API - connect-src CSP policy

So is the plan to get properties currently using PaymentHandler to experiment with this and see if there's breakage? Should we initially ship a "report only" mode that would help all properties know that CSP errors may be happening soon? On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 6:20 PM Rouslan Solomakhin wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Array grouping

LGTM1 On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 2:30 AM Shu-yu Guo wrote: > Contact emails...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-grouping/blob/main/README.md > > Specificationhttps://tc39.es/proposal-array-grouping/ > > Summary > > Adds news Array.prototype methods groupBy() and g

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment 2: Web app launch handler

Spec issue: https://github.com/WICG/sw-launch/issues/62 Chromium issue: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1213776 On Tuesday, 20 September 2022 at 1:28:16 am UTC+10 Dan Dumont wrote: > Is there a tracking issue for the share target interaction problem? > I'm eager to see this

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Array grouping

Contact emails...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-grouping/blob/main/README.md Specificationhttps://tc39.es/proposal-array-grouping/ Summary Adds news Array.prototype methods groupBy() and groupByToMap() to perform a grouping or bucketing operation. Blink componen

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to deprecate and remove ImageDecoderInit.premultiplyAlpha.

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 3:36 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 11:19 PM Dale Curtis > wrote: > >> Contact emailsdalecur...@chromium.org >> >> ExplainerNone >> >> Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/issues/508 >> >> Summary >> premultiplyAlpha tells ImageDecoder to mult

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Web Payment API - connect-src CSP policy

Contact emailssmcgr...@chromium.org, rous...@chromium.org Specificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/payment-method-manifest/#processing-model Summary Deprecate the ability for Web Payment API to bypass the connect-src CSP policy when fetching the manifest. After this deprecation, a site's connect-src C

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to ship: Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Motion client hint header

> > TAG review > > https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/632 > > TAG review status > > Unsatisfied > To add some more nuance to the unsatisfied TAG review, here's the TAG's summary, with our reactions: > *As you mentioned - ...this is not aimed at the average website.. Not all Web p

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to experiment: Deprecate and remove merchant identity in "canmakepayment"

> Chrome is reaching out to the known partners that may be depending on these fields. We have reached out to the known partners with dev-trial instructions and received back feedback that this change does not affect their API usage. > Estimated milestones > Origin trial: 108 > LGTM to run Origi

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: SoftNavigation performance entry

Hi Yoav! We went through this in the OWP security&privacy review and I wasn't sure what kind of mitigation we had in place for credentialed third party sub resources timing. Do we have none and need to make sure the heuristic cannot be abused or can we rely on a safety net? Thanks! Arthur On Sa

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: PaymentInstruments

> Would we expect those uses to break? Are they feature detecting the API before using it? Partially (for both questions!). In examining the site logic we have found that: Good news: 1. These websites will correctly fall back to JIT install of payment handlers in the absence of PaymentInst

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to ship: Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Motion client hint header

> > TAG review > > https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/632 > > TAG review status > > Unsatisfied > To add some more nuance to the unsatisfied TAG review, here's the TAG's summary, with our reactions: > *As you mentioned - ...this is not aimed at the average website.. Not all Web platf

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Conditional Focus

Can you send a separate extension intent for this? Thanks! :) On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 2:04 AM 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hello Blink owners. The WebRTC WG has reached rough consensus on > Conditional Focus. The conclusions are summarized in these two threads ( >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to deprecate and remove ImageDecoderInit.premultiplyAlpha.

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 11:19 PM Dale Curtis wrote: > Contact emailsdalecur...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/issues/508 > > Summary > premultiplyAlpha tells ImageDecoder to multiply the alpha channel into the > RGB channels of decoded images. It

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AudioContext.setSinkId()

Once the PR lands, this seems fine to ship (IMO). Let us know when that happens :) On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:56 PM Hongchan Choi wrote: > The original proposal didn't work out well because of the type confusion > in the union (DOMString or AudioSinkCategory) - they are both DOMString in > the en

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: PaymentInstruments

On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 9:03 PM Rouslan Solomakhin wrote: > Hi Mike, > > > do we have any reason to believe there are consumers of this API who > have disabled telemetry, i.e. maybe in enterprise contexts? > > We don't have any indications that this could be happening. > > > do we know how these

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Motion client hint header

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:56 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 7:20:45 AM UTC+2 fbea...@google.com > wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 5:49 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 4:21 PM 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev < >>> blink-dev@chromium.org> w