Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Handwriting Recognition API

We expect the following to potentially be closed source: - The OS-specific implementation of the handwriting recognizer and its models. In other words, how to convert a list of points to some recognized text. Example: the implementation of Microsoft Windows Ink, and Windows Ink’s E

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Pickling for Async Clipboard API

Here is the PR for pickling API: https://github.com/w3c/editing/pull/383 From: Anupam Snigdha Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 9:41 AM To: 'Chris Harrelson' Cc: Philip Jägenstedt ; Daniel Bratell ; Yoav Weiss ; blink-dev ; Alex Russell ; Abhishek Rathi ; svo...@gmail.com ; ajayra...@google.co

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Aligning Resource Timing's `nextHopProtocol` attribute with the specs

We expect/hope to ship this in M99. On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 3:07:42 PM UTC-5 Joe Medley wrote: > Which version is this shipping in? > Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com | > 816-678-7195 <(816)%20678-7195> > *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.* >

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Aligning Resource Timing's `nextHopProtocol` attribute with the specs

Which version is this shipping in? Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com | 816-678-7195 *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.* On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:13 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > If Gecko and Webkit don't have this behavior, then please file a bug > aga

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC Scalable Video Coding extensions

When are you hoping to ship? On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 9:16:28 AM UTC-8 yoav...@chromium.org wrote: > LGTM3 > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 5:52 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > >> LGTM2 >> >> /Daniel >> On 2022-01-05 17:51, Chris Harrelson wrote: >> >> LGTM1 to ship scalabilityMode, but not the pl

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Aligning Resource Timing's `nextHopProtocol` attribute with the specs

If Gecko and Webkit don't have this behavior, then please file a bug against them to make them aware. Otherwise, it seems reasonable to treat this as a bugfix rather than an intent-to-ship. +Joe Medley so that this change can be noted in the next beta blog post. On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:56 AM To

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Aligning Resource Timing's `nextHopProtocol` attribute with the specs

Hi Chris, I have not checked to see Gecko's/WebKit's behaviour here. I planned to track their WPT results once the patch lands upstream and file bugs/make fixes as needed. Let me know if we think this is worth verifying on other browsers beforehand and/or if I should reach out to those folks too

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Pickling for Async Clipboard API

Hi Chris, Happy new year to you too 😊. Yes, the text would be in spec language, but it won’t be part of the clipboard API spec (at least for now). I’m almost done with the changes. Will upload it to EditingWG by today EOD. I’ve also addressed all comments

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Aligning Resource Timing's `nextHopProtocol` attribute with the specs

Hi Tom, Four questions: * Do Webkit and Gecko implement the same behavior already? * Will RUM providers need to be notified? * In what milestone will this be shipped? * I assume that the behavior you're implementing is already specified and tested in WPT? On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:10 AM Tom McKee

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Handwriting Recognition API

LGTM3 On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:19 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM1 from Alex came in a non-threaded message: > > "LGTM. > > Per conversation in the API OWNERs, it'd be great to have a list in this > thread of the bits that will be closed-source and potentially diverge by > platform. Thanks!" >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Allow infinity, -infinity and NaN in CSS calc()

LGTM3 On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:17 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > Alex replied with LGTM1 in another thread on blink-dev: "LGTM, however > this should be sent to the TAG as an FYI. It's new design language that > they will want/need to be aware of when considering other reviews. There > isn't a carv

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Handwriting Recognition API

LGTM1 from Alex came in a non-threaded message: "LGTM. Per conversation in the API OWNERs, it'd be great to have a list in this thread of the bits that will be closed-source and potentially diverge by platform. Thanks!" LGTM2 from me, but please reply with the bits Alex mentioned thanks. On Wed

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Allow infinity, -infinity and NaN in CSS calc()

Alex replied with LGTM1 in another thread on blink-dev: "LGTM, however this should be sent to the TAG as an FYI. It's new design language that they will want/need to be aware of when considering other reviews. There isn't a carveout for TAG review for CSS." LGTM2 from me. On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: Allow infinity, -infinity and NaN in CSS calc()

(fyi this is a test of a new method of replying to intent threads, we're still debugging it) On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:10 AM slightlyoff via Chromestatus < admin+slightly...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > LGTM, however this should be sent to the TAG as an FYI. It's new design > language that

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC Scalable Video Coding extensions

LGTM3 On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 5:52 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2022-01-05 17:51, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > LGTM1 to ship scalabilityMode, but not the pluralized name or > referenceScaling. > > Please open a new intent if you wish to ship one of the others (otherwise > this

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: Handwriting Recognition API

(fyi this is a test of a new method of replying to intent threads, we're still debugging it) On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:10 AM slightlyoff via Chromestatus < admin+slightly...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > LGTM. > > Per conversation in the API OWNERs, it'd be great to have a list in this > th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CORS non-wildcard request-header

Hey Yutaka! We discussed this at the API owners meeting today (Daniel, Chris, Alex, MikeT and myself). It seems like the risk here is too high to remove support as is, and a reasonable next step may be to add the metric to UKM and get a more detailed view of which sites are using it and how. Th

[blink-dev] Intent to ship: Handwriting Recognition API

LGTM. Per conversation in the API OWNERs, it'd be great to have a list in this thread of the bits that will be closed-source and potentially diverge by platform. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this gr

[blink-dev] Intent to ship: Allow infinity, -infinity and NaN in CSS calc()

LGTM, however this should be sent to the TAG as an FYI. It's new design language that they will want/need to be aware of when considering other reviews. There isn't a carveout for TAG review for CSS. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group

[blink-dev] PSA: Aligning Resource Timing's `nextHopProtocol` attribute with the specs

Howdy! I'm working to land a CL to fix crbug.com/1284631 to better align our implementation of Resource Timing with the Resource Timing and Fetch specs. The result of this change will affect al

[blink-dev] PSA: A fix for web-exposed First Input Delay

Hi all, Recently we landed a CL for web-exposed First Input Delay. On the desktop, when we click on a web page, the input event sequence would be pointerdown, mousedown, pointerup, mouseup. The first input should be the pointerdo

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC Scalable Video Coding extensions

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2022-01-05 17:51, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 to ship scalabilityMode, but not the pluralized name or referenceScaling. Please open a new intent if you wish to ship one of the others (otherwise this intent-to-ship would be too confusing). Thanks, and happy new year. On M

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC Scalable Video Coding extensions

LGTM1 to ship scalabilityMode, but not the pluralized name or referenceScaling. Please open a new intent if you wish to ship one of the others (otherwise this intent-to-ship would be too confusing). Thanks, and happy new year. On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 12:07 PM 'Chris Cunningham' via blink-dev < b

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Pickling for Async Clipboard API

Hi Anupam, Happy new year. When you say "article" in WICG or EditingWG do you mean spec? If so, that sounds fine. On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:21 PM 'Anupam Snigdha' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Philip, > > Yes, https://github.com/w3c/clipboard-apis/pull/162 >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: mix-blend-mode: plus-lighter

Hi Rego, Thank you for your feedback. I just filed https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/607 as a request for a position from Mozilla. We don't have any immediate plans to implement or support plus-darker, but I will file some bugs to explore how viable it is for us to support th