Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Array and TypedArray findLast and findLastIndex

LGTM3  (I sent an LGTM1 yesterday but as a direct mail, doh) On 2021-10-08 06:18, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:40 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:22 AM 'Shu-yu Guo' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails s..

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebTransport

*LGTM2* to ship without certificate fingerprints. It'd be great to ensure public documentation for this includes the fallback mechanism we want developers to implement. (both in the web.dev article and future MDN documentation). On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:19 PM Mike West wrote: > LGTM1, to ship th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-synthesis property

Guys i guess i don't deserve to have this , because I don't really understand what it is and how it works, any tips? On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 12:27:56 PM UTC-7 Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM3 > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 3:34 AM 'Munira Tursunova' via blink-dev < > blin...@chromium.org> wrot

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Array and TypedArray findLast and findLastIndex

LGTM2 On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:40 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:22 AM 'Shu-yu Guo' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Contact emails...@chromium.org >> >> Explainerhttps://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-find-from-last >> >> Specificationhttps:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: interactionID in Event Timing

LGTM1 On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 1:15 PM Nicolás Peña wrote: > We do want to make it easier to track asynchronous work, and I think this > will require something such as `measureUntil`. Once we implement that, it > would be plausible to extend EventTiming to include that > developer-annotated async

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Array and TypedArray findLast and findLastIndex

LGTM1 On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:22 AM 'Shu-yu Guo' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emails...@chromium.org > > Explainerhttps://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-find-from-last > > Specificationhttps://tc39.es/proposal-array-find-from-last/index.html > > Summary > > This is a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: interactionID in Event Timing

We do want to make it easier to track asynchronous work, and I think this will require something such as `measureUntil`. Once we implement that, it would be plausible to extend EventTiming to include that developer-annotated async duration. It would also make it possible to annotate any User Timing

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: URL Protocol Handler Registration for PWAs

LGTM3 once the spec PR lands. I agree with your reasoning about why an email to webkit-dev would not be productive. On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 12:40 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:28 PM Mike West wrote: > >> LGTM1. The UX treatment ran through internal security/privacy r

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: URL Protocol Handler Registration for PWAs

LGTM2 On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:28 PM Mike West wrote: > LGTM1. The UX treatment ran through internal security/privacy review, and > doesn't create risk above and beyond the existing JavaScript API, which we > ship currently and accept. > > -mike > > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 10:56 PM Diego Gonzál

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Allow simple Range header values without preflight

LGTM2 On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 9:31:00 PM UTC+2 Mike West wrote: > LGTM1. > > This seems correct to me from a behavior perspective, and I'm comfortable > considering this to be small enough to avoid explicit signal requirements, > and to accept the fact that it's landed in the spec as be

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Allow simple Range header values without preflight

LGTM1. This seems correct to me from a behavior perspective, and I'm comfortable considering this to be small enough to avoid explicit signal requirements, and to accept the fact that it's landed in the spec as being Good Enough. -mike On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 2:12 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: URL Protocol Handler Registration for PWAs

LGTM1. The UX treatment ran through internal security/privacy review, and doesn't create risk above and beyond the existing JavaScript API, which we ship currently and accept. -mike On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 10:56 PM Diego González wrote: > Hola Chris, > > 1. We have applied for signals through t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-synthesis property

LGTM3 On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 3:34 AM 'Munira Tursunova' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > > Looking at the font-synthesis-* tests in > https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-fonts?label=experimental&label=master&aligned, > many pass in Firefox and Safari, but not all of them. Do all of th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebTransport

LGTM1, to ship this without the certificate fingerprint portion of 349 discussed above. There's still some conversation to be had there, and I think it's worth finishing the discussion before shipping it since it's quite clearly separable. I'd suggest shipping that as a separate intent if that's th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Content-Security-Policy delivery via response headers for dedicated workers.

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2021-10-07 21:16, Chris Harrelson wrote: Thanks! LGTM2 On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:11 AM Antonio Sartori wrote: On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 5:09 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: One more requirement from my perspective, and one question below. Thanks. Replies i

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Content-Security-Policy delivery via response headers for dedicated workers.

Thanks! LGTM2 On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:11 AM Antonio Sartori wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 5:09 PM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> One more requirement from my perspective, and one question below. >> >> > Thanks. Replies inline. > > >> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 2:50 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: >> >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: App Shortcuts Menu (Mac/Linux)

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2021-10-07 20:58, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 11:57 AM Mike West wrote: Extending the existing support from Android and Windows to Mac and Linux is quite reasonable. LGTM1. That said, it would be ideal to ping https://github.com/mozil

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Auto-expand details elements

LGTM2. Please do follow up on any feedback you obtain from the TAG, since I believe the review request there is still outstanding. It doesn't appear to me that there are substantial design questions that are still open, but if something interesting is raised, we should respond to it expediently.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: App Shortcuts Menu (Mac/Linux)

LGTM2 On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 11:57 AM Mike West wrote: > Extending the existing support from Android and Windows to Mac and Linux > is quite reasonable. LGTM1. > > That said, it would be ideal to ping > https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/338 in the hopes of > keeping this on M

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: App Shortcuts Menu (Mac/Linux)

Extending the existing support from Android and Windows to Mac and Linux is quite reasonable. LGTM1. That said, it would be ideal to ping https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/338 in the hopes of keeping this on Mozilla's radar in the hopes of eventual interop. -mike On Thu, Oct

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: interactionID in Event Timing

So this design looks pretty good in terms of auto-generating a uniform ID for pre-baked events, but I'm curious about how it will interact with asynchronous tasks generated from within task callbacks, and how a user-timing mark from within one of these scopes might inherit the interactionID?

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Array and TypedArray findLast and findLastIndex

Contact emails...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-find-from-last Specificationhttps://tc39.es/proposal-array-find-from-last/index.html Summary This is a Stage 3 TC39 proposal that adds the methods findLast and findLastIndex to Array.prototype and the various TypedAr

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: transform: perspective(none)

Thanks for the LGTMs. I filed WebKit bug 231361 for implementing perspective(none) in WebKit, and for MDN documentation of perspective() I created PR mdn/content#9653 (fixing some other issues as well) and

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Add support for Promise to Blobs in clipboard item

Yep, I'll address the feedback from Anne and mbrodesser (from Mozilla). Thanks for all your help Anne and Yoav! From: Yoav Weiss Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 12:03 AM To: Anupam Snigdha Cc: ann...@annevk.nl; blink-dev@chromium.org; m...@chromium.org; Bo Cupp Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [bli

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: App Shortcuts Menu (Mac/Linux)

Contact emails mjack...@microsoft.com, mandy.c...@microsoft.com, est...@google.com, ajayrahate...@google.com Explainer Shortcuts Explainer Spec W3C spec: https://w3c.github.io/manifest/#shortcuts-member Tag

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: App Shortcuts Menu

Contact emails mjack...@microsoft.com, mandy.c...@microsoft.com, est...@google.com, ajayrahate...@google.com Explainer Shortcuts Explainer Spec W3C spec: https://w3c.github.io/manifest/#shortcuts-member Tag

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Auto Dark Mode & the CSS color-scheme “only” keyword

LGTM to experiment M96-M99 (inclusive) On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 5:12 PM Peter Beverloo wrote: > Thanks Yoav! > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 8:15 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> This seems extremely useful! >> >> What are the timelines for experimentation? Do you have partners lined up >> that are ready to

[blink-dev] Promise to blobs in Clipboard

Anupam, Thank you for letting me know. This is off my list. Joe Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com | 816-678-7195 *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.* On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 2:27 PM Anupam Snigdha wrote: > Hey Joe, > > I don't think I would be able to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Auto Dark Mode & the CSS color-scheme “only” keyword

Thanks Yoav! On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 8:15 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > This seems extremely useful! > > What are the timelines for experimentation? Do you have partners lined up > that are ready to play with this? > The experiment will start in M96, and will last until (& including M99). We have sever

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebTransport

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 5:51 PM Yutaka Hirano wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 5:38 PM Philip Jägenstedt > wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:04 AM Yutaka Hirano >> wrote: >> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 4:45 PM Philip Jägenstedt >>> wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: interactionID in Event Timing

On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 1:58:59 AM UTC-4 Yoav Weiss wrote: > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 7:13 PM Nicolás Peña wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> n...@chromium.org, hbs...@chromium.org >> >> Explainer >> >> https://gist.github.com/npm1/9c2b95ece116d9bcb4bc224155e23777 >> >> Specification >> >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Allow simple Range header values without preflight

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 11:58 AM Rayan Kanso wrote: > Can we ask WebKit folks for a signal? > > > There's this bug filed > against WebKit. I'm not aware of any other channels to get feedback. > https://bit.ly/blink-signals > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-synthesis property

> Looking at the font-synthesis-* tests in https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-fonts?label=experimental&label=master&aligned, many pass in Firefox and Safari, but not all of them. Do all of these tests pass with the implementation now in Blink? Yes, they do. Actually these tests had been added wi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Allow simple Range header values without preflight

> > Can we ask WebKit folks for a signal? There's this bug filed against WebKit. I'm not aware of any other channels to get feedback. On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 8:24 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 10:22 PM Mike Taylor > wrote: >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Region Capture

LGTM to experiment M97-M100 (inclusive) On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:34 AM Elad Alon wrote: > Thanks for catching that typo. The corrected request is m97 - m100. > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:20 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> Do I understand correctly and you want to experiment for a single >> milestone

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebTransport

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 5:38 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:04 AM Yutaka Hirano > wrote: > >> Thank you! >> >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 4:45 PM Philip Jägenstedt >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:20 PM Yutaka Hirano >>> wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 4, 202

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebTransport

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:04 AM Yutaka Hirano wrote: > Thank you! > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 4:45 PM Philip Jägenstedt > wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:20 PM Yutaka Hirano >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 10:04 PM Philip Jägenstedt >>> wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Region Capture

Thanks for catching that typo. The corrected request is m97 - m100. On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:20 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > Do I understand correctly and you want to experiment for a single > milestone? (M97) > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:12 PM 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wr

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-synthesis property

It's great to see this feature getting ready to ship, it's one of a relatively small number of features already supported by Firefox and Safari but not by Chromium browsers, so it's been on my radar :) I just have a few questions. Looking at the font-synthesis-* tests in https://wpt.fyi/results/c

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebTransport

Thank you! On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 4:45 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:20 PM Yutaka Hirano wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 10:04 PM Philip Jägenstedt >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:27 PM Yutaka Hirano >>> wrote: >>> Hi Philip, Sorry fo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-synthesis property

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2021-10-07 09:08, Yoav Weiss wrote: *LGTM1* Thanks for working on this!! This seems like an important thing to catch up on! On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 6:56 PM 'Munira Tursunova' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails moon...@google.com, dr...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebAssembly Content Security Policy

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2021-10-07 09:25, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM2 On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 12:11 AM 'Francis McCabe' via blink-dev wrote: Confirming: there is no current plan to modify how extensions would work. I was alluding to semi-solid thoughts on how a possible wasm-src policy

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: transform: perspective(none)

LGTM3, this is an easy case, an improvement to an existing feature already on track to ship in another browser. Although not part of our launch process, can I ask what documentation updates will be needed here? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/transform-function/perspective() doesn

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebTransport

On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:20 PM Yutaka Hirano wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 10:04 PM Philip Jägenstedt > wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:27 PM Yutaka Hirano >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Philip, >>> >>> Sorry for the belated reply. Comments inline: >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 7:31 PM Philip

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: WritableStream controller AbortSignal

After talking to Nidhi offline, we can consider this intent on hold until the feedback is addressed. On Thursday, September 16, 2021 at 4:01:29 AM UTC+2 Nidhi Jaju wrote: > Hi, > > Just as an update, we have received some feedback on our TAG review ( > https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/i

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTP->HTTPS redirect for HTTPS DNS records

+1 to Mike's request. I think a Fetch PR for this seems both useful and not-extremely-onerous to pull together. On Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 9:20:23 PM UTC+2 Mike West wrote: > This all looks good, thanks. > > I'd like to see the Fetch PR up before we ship this. It's a little > surprising

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Origin Trial: Early Hints preload/preconnect during Navigation

LGTM to extend to M98. 5 milestones overall seems reasonable. On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 8:39 AM Kenichi Ishibashi wrote: > We would like to extend Early Hints preload/preconnect Origin Trial to M98 > (originally planned to end in M96). > > Contact emailsba...@chromium.org, yhir...@chromium.org, > d

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebAssembly Content Security Policy

LGTM2 On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 12:11 AM 'Francis McCabe' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Confirming: there is no current plan to modify how extensions would work. > I was alluding to semi-solid thoughts on how a possible wasm-src policy > would work. But, in any case, wasm-unsafe-e

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Allow simple Range header values without preflight

On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 10:22 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > On 10/5/21 6:50 AM, Rayan Kanso wrote: > > Contact emails rayank...@chromium.org, jakearchib...@chromium.org > > Specification https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/ > Diff: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1312 > > Summary > > Allows requests with

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Region Capture

Do I understand correctly and you want to experiment for a single milestone? (M97) On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:12 PM 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emailselada...@chromium.org, mfo...@chromium.org, > jop...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/eladal

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Auto Dark Mode & the CSS color-scheme “only” keyword

This seems extremely useful! What are the timelines for experimentation? Do you have partners lined up that are ready to play with this? Also, the intent seems to be missing many fields (signals from other vendors and developers, TAG review, etc) Can you complete the missing ones from the Chrome

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-synthesis property

*LGTM1* Thanks for working on this!! This seems like an important thing to catch up on! On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 6:56 PM 'Munira Tursunova' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emails > > moon...@google.com, dr...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fon

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: App Shortcuts Menu

Can you send a new intent for that purpose? Thanks! :) On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 6:18 PM 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > This feature previously shipped for Windows and Android > https://chromestatus.com/feature/5706099464339456. Requesting approval to >

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Add support for Promise to Blobs in clipboard item

On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 4:02 AM Anupam Snigdha wrote: > Here is a WIP PR to address the spec issue: > https://github.com/w3c/clipboard-apis/pull/158. > Can you address feedback from Anne on the PR? > > > *From:* Anupam Snigdha > *Sent:* Monday, October 4, 2021 10:45 AM > *To:* 'Yoav Weiss' ; An