Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function

Block size scaling should be as transparent and simple as possible, like pegging it to total transactions per difficulty change. -- One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function

I would support a dynamic block size increase as outlined. I have a few questions though. Is scaling by average block size the best and easiest method, why not scale by transactions confirmed instead? Anyone can write and relay a transaction, and those are what we want to scale for, why not measur

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function

American buying habits seems short sighted and no different from developers trying to choose what the right fee pressure is. On May 28, 2015 1:22 PM, "Gavin Andresen" wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Steven Pine wrote: >> >> I would support a dynamic bl