Re: [Bitcoin-development] [ann] Bitcoin Core version 0.9.2 has been released

2014-06-17 Thread Jesus Cea
On 17/06/14 11:46, Wladimir wrote: > For Linux we now build against Qt 4.6, and filter the symbols for > libstdc++ and glibc. > This brings back compatibility with > > - Debian 6+ / Tails > - Ubuntu 10.04 > - CentOS 6.5 Under Ubuntu 10.04: jcea@ubuntu:/tmp/bitcoin-0.9.2-linux/bin/64$ ./bitcoin-q

[Bitcoin-development] Downloading blockchain

2013-04-28 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would like to download the entire blockchain by hand (kind of), but I can't find software for it. The closest thing I found is "Bitcoin-protocol-test-harness" code, but it is two years old and seems not to work with current bitcoin network. Python a

Re: [Bitcoin-development] minor bitcoin-qt gripes moving BTC off specific key

2013-05-10 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/05/13 14:16, Adam Back wrote: > 3. a UX way to transfer BTC off a specific adress (eg choose from > address), rather than having to spend the entire wallet onto a new > address, just to get BTC off a specific address. Doing it that way > has p

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-Qt/bitcoind version 0.8.3 released

2013-06-25 Thread Jesus Cea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25/06/13 19:57, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Bitcoin-Qt version 0.8.3 is now available from: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.8.3/ The > "splash" banner shows "0.8.3-BETA". - -- Jesús Cea Avión

[Bitcoin-development] HEADS UP: Bitcoin 0.9.0 doesn't work on old Linux

2014-03-19 Thread Jesus Cea
I just upgraded to Bitcoin 0.9.0 and I got this: """ $ ./bitcoind ./bitcoind: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind) ./bitcoind: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./bitcoind) $ ./bitcoin-qt ./bitcoin-qt: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.1

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why are we bleeding nodes?

2014-04-08 Thread Jesus Cea
On 07/04/14 15:50, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > Bitcoin.org recommends people away from running Bitcoin-QT now, so I'm > not sure that we should generally find that trend surprising. What options are out there for people caring about 20GB blockchain? Depending of third party server is not an option.

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Chain pruning

2014-04-10 Thread Jesus Cea
On 10/04/14 18:59, Pieter Wuille wrote: > It's important to > note that this is a strict reduction in security: we're now trusting > that the longest chain (with most proof of work) commits to a valid > UTXO set (at some point in the past). AFAIK, current bitcoin code code already set blockchain c

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Chain pruning

2014-04-10 Thread Jesus Cea
On 11/04/14 00:15, Mark Friedenbach wrote: > Checkpoints will go away, eventually. Why?. The points in the forum thread seem pretty sensible. -- Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/ j...@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ Twitter: