Re: [Bitcoin-development] Implementing batch processing for -blocknotify

Thanks for the input all! You make a lot of sense :). I will go with the Unix socket method, I think. It's about time I learn about those. /Rune On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Chris Double wrote: > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Wladimir wrote: > > Using zmq is a great fit for high-speed no

[Bitcoin-development] Proposal: soft-fork to make anyone-can-spend outputs unspendable for 100 blocks

Currently the most compact way (proof-size) to sacrifice Bitcoins that does not involve making them unspendable is to create a anyone-can-spend output as the last txout in the coinbase of a block: scriptPubKey: OP_TRUE The proof is then the SHA256 midstate, the txout, and the merkle path to the

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: soft-fork to make anyone-can-spend outputs unspendable for 100 blocks

On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:34:29PM +, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Saturday, June 01, 2013 7:30:36 PM Peter Todd wrote: > > scriptPubKey: OP_TRUE > > > > ... > > Along with that change anyone-can-spend outputs should be make IsStandard() > > so they will be relayed. > > Data does not belong in the bl